...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >A comparison of forward and inverse planned conformal, multi segment and intensity modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate and pelvic nodes.
【24h】

A comparison of forward and inverse planned conformal, multi segment and intensity modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate and pelvic nodes.

机译:比较正向和反向计划的保形,多节段和强度调制放疗对前列腺和盆腔淋巴结的治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Full inverse planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may be indicated to treat concave targets like prostate and pelvic nodes, because concave dose distributions cannot be generated with conformal radiotherapy (CRT). We investigated whether this concave dose distribution can be produced using simplified forward planned multi segment radiotherapy (MSRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CRT, MSRT and IMRT dose distributions were calculated and compared for five patients treated in our current IMRT prostate and pelvic node dose escalation trial. The same beam arrangement was used for CRT, MSRT and IMRT, increasing the number of segments. The MSRT concave dose distribution was realised regarding left and right pelvic nodes as two separate targets. The IMRT dose distribution had been used to treat the patients using a step and shoot delivery. RESULTS: Contrary to CRT, forward planned MSRT concave dose distributions had improved target coverage at lower or equivalent bowel doses than inverse planned IMRT. The five MSRT beams had a maximum of three segments per beam. Both lateral beams had two segments to deliver the two dose levels to prostate and nodes. The posterior field needed a third segment to avoid using a central block. The two anterior oblique beams needed a third segment to account for the different beam weighting because the nodes were irradiated partially using four and partially using five beams. Inverse planned IMRT used up to 15 segments in any one beam, with an average of 11.4 per beam. CONCLUSIONS: Concave dose distributions for prostate and pelvic node treatment were generated using forward planned multi segment techniques. The plans met clinical constraints used in our IMRT protocol. MSRT presented a significant advantage over both CRT and IMRT.
机译:背景与目的:完全逆计划强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)可能会被指示用于治疗诸如前列腺和骨盆结之类的凹形目标,因为凹形剂量分布无法通过保形放射治疗(CRT)产生。我们调查了是否可以使用简化的前瞻性计划多节放疗(MSRT)来产生这种凹入剂量分布。患者和方法:计算并比较了在我们目前的IMRT前列腺和盆腔淋巴结剂量递增试验中接受治疗的五名患者的CRT,MSRT和IMRT剂量分布。 CRT,MSRT和IMRT使用相同的光束布置,增加了段数。 MSRT凹面剂量分布是将左和右骨盆结点作为两个单独的目标实现的。 IMRT剂量分布已用于分步给药和射出治疗。结果:与CRT相反,与反向计划的IMRT相比,前瞻性计划的MSRT凹面剂量分布在更低或等效的肠道剂量下改善了目标覆盖率。五个MSRT光束每个光束最多三个部分。两个横梁都有两个部分,以将两种剂量水平输送到前列腺和淋巴结。后场需要第三段以避免使用中央阻滞。两个前斜光束需要第三段来说明不同的光束权重,因为节点分别使用四个光束和部分使用五个光束进行照射。反向计划的IMRT在任何一个波束中最多使用15个分段,平均每个波束11.4。结论:前列腺和骨盆结治疗的凹形剂量分布是使用前瞻性计划多段技术产生的。这些计划符合我们的IMRT协议中使用的临床限制。 MSRT与CRT和IMRT相比均具有显着优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号