...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Patients with brain metastases: hope for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 3.
【24h】

Patients with brain metastases: hope for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 3.

机译:脑转移患者:希望进行3级递归分区分析(RPA)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The objectives of the present study were (a) to validate the prognostic classification derived from recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG); (b) to identify prognostic factors in class 3; (c) to examine the impact of treatment related variables on the prognosis in class 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and sixteen patients with brain metastases had resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT, n = 257) or WBRT alone (n = 659) at our institution from 1985 to 2000. Patients were grouped into RPA classes 1, 2, and 3 (n = 67, 441, and 408, respectively). RESULTS: Median survival of the whole group was 3.4 months. Median survival in classes 1, 2, and 3 was 8.2, 4.9, and 1.8 months, respectively. In class 3, age (<65 years vs. > or =65 years, relative risk (RR) 0.75), status of the primary tumor (controlled vs. uncontrolled, RR 0.86), and the number of brain metastases (single vs. multiple, RR 0.76) were independent prognostic variables. We defined three prognostic subgroups: class 3a (n = 51): age <65 years, controlled primary tumor, single brain metastasis; class 3c (n = 44): age > or =65 years, uncontrolled primary tumor, multiple brain metastases; class 3b (n = 313): all other patients. Median survival in classes 3a, 3b, and 3c was 3.2, 1.9, and 1.2 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). Intra-class comparisons showed that resection followed by WBRT yielded significantly better survival compared with WBRT alone. CONCLUSION: Our results validate the RTOG RPA classification for patients with brain metastases. The variables age, status of the primary, and number of brain metastases allow the division of class 3 into prognostic subgroups. Even class 3 patients may benefit from more aggressive treatment strategies.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是(a)验证放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)的递归分区分析(RPA)得出的预后分类; (b)确定第3类的预后因素; (c)检验治疗相关变量对第3类患者预后的影响。患者与方法:916例脑转移患者行了切除和全脑放疗(WBRT,n = 257)或单独进行WBRT(n = 659)。 ),从1985年至2000年在我们的机构进行研究。将患者分为RPA第1、2和3级(分别为n = 67、441和408)。结果:整个组的中位生存期为3.4个月。第1、2和3类的中位生存期分别为8.2、4.9和1.8个月。在第3类中,年龄(<65岁vs.>或= 65岁,相对风险(RR)0.75),原发性肿瘤的状况(可控与不可控,RR 0.86)以及脑转移的数量(单发vs. RR = 0.76)是独立的预后变量。我们定义了三个预后亚组:3a类(n = 51):年龄<65岁,可控制的原发肿瘤,单脑转移; 3c级(n = 44):年龄>或= 65岁,原发肿瘤不受控制,多发脑转移; 3b级(n = 313):所有其他患者。 3a,3b和3c级的中位生存期分别为3.2、1.9和1.2个月(P <0.0001)。类内比较显示,与单独进行WBRT相比,切除后进行WBRT可以显着提高生存率。结论:我们的结果验证了脑转移患者的RTOG RPA分类。变量年龄,原发状态和脑转移数目可将3级患者分为预后亚组。即使是3级患者也可能会从更积极的治疗策略中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号