...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: comparison with an intergroup study. Is combined modality treatment really necessary?
【24h】

Radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: comparison with an intergroup study. Is combined modality treatment really necessary?

机译:晚期鼻咽癌患者单独进行放射治疗:与组间研究的比较。联合方式治疗真的必要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To examine the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and to compare the results with those reported by the Intergroup study 0099 (IGS) comparing RT to combined modality therapy (CMT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period 1985-1992, 198 NPC patients presenting without distant metastatic disease were treated for cure. Of these, 172 had stage III/IV (UICC 1987, 1992). Planned RT was 2 Gy/day fraction to 60-66 Gy to the primary tumor, with 50 and 60 Gy to the node negative and to palpable nodes, respectively. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), defined from the time of registration at our institution. RESULTS: The TNM categories and other prognostic factors were similar to the IGS, though 80% had stage IV compared to 91% in IGS. The 5 year OS and DFS for the 172 patients with stage III/IV disease were 62 and 48%, respectively, as compared to the IGS results of OS 37% and DFS 29% for RT alone, and OS 67% and DFS 58% for the CMT arm of IGS. When the distribution of adverse prognostic factors was balanced between both studies the comparative results were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The early results for RT alone of this single institution experience are superior to those of the IGS control arm (RT), while somewhat inferior to those reported in the chemo-radiotherapy arm. The surprisingly poor outcome of the IGS/RT control arm may have resulted by chance, suggesting the need for a confirmatory randomized trial to fully establish the role of combined chemotherapy and radiation, as used in the IGS.
机译:目的:检查晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者单独接受放射治疗(RT)的结果,并将其结果与小组间研究0099(IGS)报道的将RT与联合方式治疗(CMT)进行比较。材料与方法:在1985-1992年期间,对198例无远处转移性疾病的NPC患者进行了治疗。其中172个处于III / IV期(UICC 1987,1992)。计划的RT为2 Gy /天,至原发肿瘤为60-66 Gy,淋巴结阴性和可触及淋巴结分别为50和60 Gy。结果包括从我们机构注册之日起定义的总体生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:TNM类别和其他预后因素与IGS相似,尽管80%处于IV期,而IGS为91%。 172名III / IV期患者的5年OS和DFS分别为62%和48%,而IGS的IGS结果分别为RT的OS 37%和DFS 29%,OS 67%和DFS 58% IGS的CMT部门。当在两个研究之间平衡不良预后因素的分布时,比较结果保持不变。结论:仅凭这种单一机构经验,早期放疗的早期结果优于IGS对照组(RT)的结果,但稍逊于化学放射治疗组的报道。 IGS / RT控制臂的结果差强人意,可能是偶然的结果,这表明需要进行一项验证性随机试验,以完全确定IGS中使用的化学疗法和放射疗法的联合作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号