...
首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins.
【24h】

A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins.

机译:对用于评估新型蛋白质安全性的常用体外胃蛋白酶消化测定方案进行多实验室评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rationale. Evaluation of the potential allergenicity of proteins derived from genetically modified foods has involved a weight of evidence approach that incorporates an evaluation of protein digestibility in pepsin. Currently, there is no standardized protocol to assess the digestibility of proteins using simulated gastric fluid. Potential variations in assay parameters include: pH, pepsin purity, pepsin to target protein ratio, target protein purity, and method of detection. The objective was to assess the digestibility of a common set of proteins in nine independent laboratories to determine the reproducibility of the assay when performed using a common protocol. Methods. A single lot of each test protein and pepsin was obtained and distributed to each laboratory. The test proteins consisted of Ara h 2 (a peanut conglutin-like protein), beta-lactoglobulin, bovine serum albumin, concanavalin A, horseradish peroxidase, ovalbumin, ovomucoid, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, ribulose diphosphate carboxylase, and soybean trypsin inhibitor. A ratio of 10U of pepsin activity/microg test protein was selected for all tests (3:1 pepsin to protein, w:w). Digestions were performed at pH 1.2 and 2.0, with sampling at 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60min. Protein digestibility was assessed from stained gels following SDS-PAGE of digestion samples and controls. Results. Results were relatively consistent across laboratories for the full-length proteins. The identification of proteolytic fragments was less consistent, being affected by different fixation and staining methods. Overall, assay pH did not influence the time to disappearance of the full-length protein or protein fragments, however, results across laboratories were more consistent at pH 1.2 (91% agreement) than pH 2.0 (77%). Conclusions. These data demonstrate that this common protocol for evaluating the in vitro digestibility of proteins is reproducible and yields consistent results when performed using the same proteins at different laboratories.
机译:基本原理。对来自转基因食品的蛋白质的潜在变应原性的评估涉及大量证据方法,该方法结合了对胃蛋白酶中蛋白质消化率的评估。目前,尚无标准化协议可使用模拟胃液评估蛋白质的消化率。测定参数的潜在变化包括:pH,胃蛋白酶纯度,胃蛋白酶与目标蛋白的比例,目标蛋白纯度和检测方法。目的是评估在九个独立实验室中一组通用蛋白质的消化率,以确定使用通用规程进行测定时的可重复性。方法。获得每种测试蛋白和胃蛋白酶的一份,并分配给每个实验室。测试蛋白包括Ara h 2(一种花生凝集素样蛋白),β-乳球蛋白,牛血清白蛋白,伴刀豆球蛋白A,辣根过氧化物酶,卵清蛋白,卵粘液,膦丝菌素乙酰转移酶,核糖二磷酸羧化酶和大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂。对于所有测试,选择10U胃蛋白酶活性/微克测试蛋白的比例(胃蛋白酶与蛋白的比例为3:1,w:w)。消化在pH 1.2和2.0下进行,采样时间分别为0.5、2、5、10、20、30和60分钟。在对消化样品和对照进行SDS-PAGE后,从染色的凝胶中评估蛋白质的消化率。结果。整个实验室的全长蛋白质结果相对一致。蛋白水解片段的鉴定不太一致,受不同的固定和染色方法的影响。总体而言,测定pH值不会影响全长蛋白质或蛋白质片段消失的时间,但是,在pH 1.2(一致性为91%)时,实验室的结果比pH 2.0(77%)时更为一致。结论这些数据表明,这种用于评估蛋白质体外消化率的通用方案是可重现的,并且在不同实验室使用相同蛋白质进行检测时可获得一致的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号