...
首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Particulate matter in ambient air and mortality: toxicologic perspectives.
【24h】

Particulate matter in ambient air and mortality: toxicologic perspectives.

机译:周围空气中的颗粒物和死亡率:毒理学观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

U.S. regulations that set standards for acceptable concentrations of respirable particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air, particularly total fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)), are based largely on the belief that current concentrations cause death and illness, and that reducing these concentrations will save lives. Because the mortality risk estimates from important observational epidemiologic studies are extremely weak, derived from studies unable to control for relevant confounding causes, and inconsistent by location, toxicologic and clinical information is necessary to judge the likelihood and degree to which such findings are causal. Toxicologic data on typical forms of pollution-derived PM strongly suggest that current ambient concentrations in the U.S. are too small to cause significant disease or death. We review here the results of inhalation studies using concentrated ambient particles, diesel engine exhaust particulate matter, and sulfate and nitrate salts, and find no evidence that moderate concentrations are lethal. The expectation that lives will be saved by reducing ambient PM(2.5) in the U.S. is not supported by the weight of scientific evidence, although other bases for regulating PM may be justifiable.
机译:美国法规为室外空气中可吸入颗粒物(PM)的可接受浓度,特别是总细颗粒物(PM(2.5))设定了标准,主要是基于以下信念:目前的浓度会导致死亡和疾病,并降低这些浓度将挽救生命。由于重要的观察流行病学研究得出的死亡风险估计值非常微弱,是由于无法控制相关混杂原因的研究得出的,并且因位置而异,因此毒理学和临床信息对于判断这些发现的可能性和程度是必要的。有关污染源PM的典型形式的毒理学数据强烈表明,美国目前的环境浓度过小,不足以导致重大疾病或死亡。我们在这里回顾了使用浓缩的环境颗粒,柴油发动机排气颗粒物以及硫酸盐和硝酸盐进行吸入研究的结果,但没有发现中等浓度具有致命性的证据。尽管有其他调节PM的依据可能是合理的,但通过减少美国环境PM(2.5)可以挽救生命的期望并未得到科学依据的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号