...
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape Ecology >Ecosystem services of regulation and support in Amazonian pioneer fronts: searching for landscape drivers
【24h】

Ecosystem services of regulation and support in Amazonian pioneer fronts: searching for landscape drivers

机译:亚马逊先锋领域的法规和支持生态系统服务:寻找景观驱动因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Landscape dynamics result from forestry and farming practices, both of which are expected to have diverse impacts on ecosystem services (ES). In this study, we investigated this general statement for regulating and supporting services via an assessment of ecosystem functions: climate regulation via carbon sequestration in soil and plant biomass, water cycle and soil erosion regulation via water infiltration in soil, and support for primary production via soil chemical quality and water storage. We tested the hypothesis that patterns of land-cover composition and structure significantly alter ES metrics at two different scales. We surveyed 54 farms in two Amazonian regions of Brazil and Colombia and assessed land-cover composition and structure from remote sensing data (farm scale) from 1990 to 2007. Simple and well-established methods were used to characterize soil and vegetation from five points in each farm (plot scale). Most ES metrics were significantly correlated with land-use (plot scale) and land-cover (farm scale) classifications; however, spatial variability in inherent soil properties, alone or in interaction with land-use or land-cover changes, contributed greatly to variability in ES metrics. Carbon stock in above-ground plant biomass and water infiltration rate decreased from forest to pasture land covers, whereas soil chemical quality and plant-available water storage capacity increased. Land-cover classifications based on structure metrics explained significantly less ES metric variation than those based on composition metrics. Land-cover composition dynamics explained 45 % (P < 0.001) of ES metric variance, 15 % by itself and 30 % in interaction with inherent soil properties. This study describes how ES evolve with landscape changes, specifying the contribution of spatial variability in the physical environment and highlighting trade-offs and synergies among ES.
机译:景观动态来自林业和耕作方式,预计两者都会对生态系统服务(ES)产生不同的影响。在这项研究中,我们通过评估生态系统功能来调查这项关于调节和支持服务的一般性陈述:通过土壤和植物生物量中碳的固存进行气候调节,通过土壤中水的渗透进行水循环和土壤侵蚀调节以及通过生态系统支持初级生产土壤化学质量和储水量。我们检验了以下假设:土地覆盖物的组成和结构模式在两个不同的尺度上显着改变了ES指标。我们调查了巴西和哥伦比亚两个亚马逊地区的54个农场,并从1990年至2007年通过遥感数据(农场规模)评估了土地覆盖的组成和结构。采用了简单而完善的方法从5个点对土壤和植被进行了表征。每个农场(地标)。大多数ES指标与土地利用(地块规模)和土地覆盖(农场规模)分类显着相关。然而,土壤固有性质的空间变异性,单独或与土地利用或土地覆盖变化的相互作用,极大地影响了生态系统指标的变异性。从森林到牧场,地上植物生物量中的碳储量和水的渗透率降低,而土壤化学质量和植物可利用的储水量增加。与结构指标相比,基于结构指标的土地覆被分类可大大减少ES指标变化。土地覆盖物组成动力学解释了ES度量方差的45%(P <0.001),本身的15%和与固有土壤特性的相互作用的30%。这项研究描述了生态系统如何随着景观的变化而演变,具体说明了自然环境中空间变异性的贡献,并着重强调了生态系统之间的权衡与协同作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号