...
首页> 外文期刊>Mycoses: Diagnosis, therapy and prophylaxis of fungal diseases >Comparison of posaconazole serum concentrations from haematological cancer patients on posaconazole tablet and oral suspension for treatment and prevention of invasive fungal infections
【24h】

Comparison of posaconazole serum concentrations from haematological cancer patients on posaconazole tablet and oral suspension for treatment and prevention of invasive fungal infections

机译:普沙康唑片和口服混悬液用于治疗和预防侵袭性真菌感染的血液癌症患者的泊沙康唑血清浓度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Posaconazole tablet formulation (PTF) was developed to optimise bioavailability. This study compared posaconazole levels between patients on the PTF and oral suspension formulation (OSF). We also examined factors that may impact posaconazole levels. The primary and secondary objectives were analysed by comparing trough levels and attainment of target level between the formulation groups. For the 86 patients on PTF and 176 on OSF, the mean first levels was 1.32 g ml(-1) (SD = 0.69) and 0.81 g ml(-1) (SD = 0.59), P < 0.0001 respectively. PTF group was more likely to achieve levels 0.7 g ml(-1) than OSF group (OR 7.97 [95 CI; 3.75-16.93], P < 0.0001). Levels from patients on PTF and with presence of acid suppression, GI GVHD, mucositis or diarrhoea were not statistically different from those without these factors. For PTF, no correlation was found between patient's weight (kg) and levels (R-2 = 0.0536, P = 0.035). The incidences of elevation in ALT/AST or Tbili were similar between the formulation groups. In conclusion, PTF should be considered the preferred formulation because it demonstrated better absorption than the OSF. Patients on PTF for prophylaxis are more likely to attain target level and may not routinely require therapeutic drug monitoring during prophylaxis.
机译:泊沙康唑片剂(PTF)的开发旨在优化生物利用度。该研究比较了PTF和口服混悬液制剂(OSF)患者之间的泊沙康唑水平。我们还研究了可能影响泊沙康唑水平的因素。通过比较制剂组之间的谷值水平和目标水平的达到,分析了主要和次要目标。对于86例PTF患者和176例OSF患者,平均第一水平分别为1.32 g ml(-1)(SD = 0.69)和0.81 g ml(-1)(SD = 0.59),P <0.0001。 PTF组比OSF组更可能达到0.7 g ml(-1)的水平(OR 7.97 [95 CI; 3.75-16.93],P <0.0001)。与没有这些因素的患者相比,接受PTF并存在酸抑制,GI GVHD,粘膜炎或腹泻的患者的水平无统计学差异。对于PTF,在患者体重(kg)与水平之间无相关性(R-2 = 0.0536,P = 0.035)。制剂组之间的ALT / AST或Tbili升高的发生率相似。总之,应将PTF视为首选配方,因为它比OSF具有更好的吸收性。接受PTF预防的患者更有可能达到目标水平,并且在预防期间可能常规不需要常规治疗药物监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号