...
首页> 外文期刊>Memory studies >When sorry isn't good enough: Official remembrance and reconciliation in Australia
【24h】

When sorry isn't good enough: Official remembrance and reconciliation in Australia

机译:当对不起还不够时:澳大利亚的官方纪念与和解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When compared with other reconciliation processes, Australian reconciliation and its acts of official remembrance have received relatively little academic attention, and yet the case raises many important questions for settler societies struggling to come to terms with past misdeeds and the burden of the past in the present. This article places Australian reconciliation in the political context of the campaign for a treaty between Indigenous peoples and the settler state that emerged in the 1980s, the institutionalization of common law Indigenous land rights during the 1990s, and the current 'intervention' in the Northern Territory. The nature and trajectory of these political events are at odds with two highly lauded official acts of remembrance made under the rubric of reconciliation, Paul Keating's Redfern Park speech in 1992, and Kevin Rudd's formal state apology in 2008. The article argues that such settler state acts of official remembrance and acknowledgement of past injustices, while far from devoid of value, are considerably diminished by the positively colonial, and inherently unjust, contemporary political context in which they were made.
机译:与其他和解程序相比,澳大利亚和解及其官方纪念活动受到的学术关注相对较少,但此案对定居者社会努力解决过去的过失和当前的负担提出了许多重要问题。本文将澳大利亚和解置于1980年代出现的争取原住民与定居者之间条约的运动,1990年代普通法将土著土地权利制度化以及北领地当前的“干预”运动的政治背景下。这些政治事件的性质和轨迹与在和解规则下作出的两项备受赞扬的官方纪念行为,保罗·基廷在1992年的雷德芬公园的讲话以及凯文·陆克文在2008年的正式国家道歉相矛盾。正式的记忆和对过去的不公正行为的承认,虽然远非没有价值,但由于其所处的积极殖民地和内在不公正的当代政治环境而大大减少了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号