...
首页> 外文期刊>Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt fur Land-und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem >Strategies of dealing with the risks of genetic engineering: Lessons from a participatory technology assessment in Germany
【24h】

Strategies of dealing with the risks of genetic engineering: Lessons from a participatory technology assessment in Germany

机译:基因工程风险应对策略:德国参与式技术评估的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The debate about the risks posed by genetic engineering is the latest rn a long line of social controversies over modern technology, which have come to dominate political debate more and more in the last two decades or so. Politically, these controversies take the form of a criticism of risk, but in fact they are an expression of objections which extend far beyond the stated aim of averting danger. As the example of the anti-nuclear movement has shown, resistance to technology fs fuelled by fundamental reservations about value systems in our society, which culturally favour technological modernization, moral utilitarianism, political pragmatism, instrumental activism, and the individualism that governs economic life. The conflicts about technology address the classical themes of political struggle: social inequality, the objectives of social development, the distribution of power, and the scope of democratic participation.
机译:关于基因工程带来的风险的辩论是现代技术上社会争论的一连串最新事件,在过去的二十多年左右的时间里,这些争论越来越多地成为政治辩论的主导。从政治上讲,这些争论以对风险的批评的形式出现,但实际上,它们是对异议的表达,其范围远远超出了避免危险的既定目标。如反核运动的例子所示,对技术的抵抗是由我们社会对价值体系的基本保留所推动的,这些保留在文化上有利于技术现代化,道德功利主义,政治实用主义,工具行动主义和支配经济生活的个人主义。关于技术的冲突解决了政治斗争的经典主题:社会不平等,社会发展的目标,权力的分配以及民主参与的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号