首页> 外文期刊>Business Law International >Remedies in Chinese Merger Control Law - Themes, Recent Cases and Developments
【24h】

Remedies in Chinese Merger Control Law - Themes, Recent Cases and Developments

机译:中国《合并控制法》的补救措施-主题,最新案例和发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China has become an important player in the review of international merger transactions, and is applying a distinctive approach with regard to remedies, which has significant implications for merging parties and their advisers. The merger control regulator (the Antimonopoly Bureau of the Ministry of Commerce or MOFCOM) has shown a clear willingness to impose wide-ranging remedies in its decisions to date. The framework governing merger control in China is set out in the Anti-monopoly Law (AML), which came into force a little under six years ago, and this permits MOFCOM to impose 'restrictive conditions' to reduce the restrictive effects of a transaction on competition. Out of the 783 cases that have been concluded as at 31 March 2014, MOFCOM has issued 21 decisions imposing remedies - meaning that restrictive conditions have been imposed in roughly 2.3 per cent of cases.
机译:中国已成为审查国际并购交易的重要参与者,并在补救措施方面采用了独特的方法,这对合并方及其顾问具有重要意义。迄今为止,合并控制监管机构(商务部反垄断局或商务部)已明确表示愿意在其决定中施加广泛的补救措施。 《反垄断法》(AML)规定了在中国进行合并控制的框架,该法律已于6年前生效,这使商务部可以施加“限制性条件”,以减少交易对企业的限制性影响。竞争。截至2014年3月31日,在已结案的783起案件中,商务部已发布21项决定采取补救措施的决定,这意味着大约2.3%的案件施加了限制性条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号