首页> 外文期刊>Business Law International >Litigation as an Abuse: European Commission and US Courts Draw a Line under 'Patent Wars' while Adopting a Common Approach on Standard Essential Patents
【24h】

Litigation as an Abuse: European Commission and US Courts Draw a Line under 'Patent Wars' while Adopting a Common Approach on Standard Essential Patents

机译:滥用诉讼:欧盟委员会和美国法院在“专利战争”下划清界限,同时对标准必要专利采取通用方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With these decisions, the Commission has signalled clearly that patent wars should not be waged at the expense of consumers and all parties have an obligation to act within the competition rules. These decisions bring much-needed legal clarity to circumstances in which patent holders can be guilty of an abuse of a dominant position contrary to Article 102 TFEU. Patent holders of SEPs have a special duty to act reasonably towards competitors or other third parties that want to have access to standardised technology through SEPs on FRAND terms. As long as patent holders are fairly remunerated for the use of their intellectual property within the FRAND system, it is abusive for patent holders to resort to injunctions in court proceedings to enforce their SEPs. It also appears that a symmetrical approach is being pursued over the Atlantic.
机译:通过这些决定,委员会已明确表示,专利战争不应以损害消费者为代价,并且各方都有义务在竞争规则之内行事。这些决定使专利持有人可能因违反《欧盟TFEU第102条》而滥用支配地位而被判有罪。 SEP的专利持有人负有特殊责任,对希望通过FRAND条款通过SEP获得标准化技术的竞争对手或其他第三方采取合理行动。只要专利持有人在FRAND系统中使用其知识产权获得应有的报酬,专利持有人在法院诉讼中诉诸强制令以强制执行其标准必要专利(SEP)就是滥用行为。看来在大西洋上也正在采取一种对称的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号