首页> 外文期刊>Geological Magazine >Age, Hf isotope and trace element signatures of detrital zircons in the Mesoproterozoic Eriksfjord sandstone, southern Greenland: Are detrital zircons reliable guides to sedimentary provenance and timing of deposition?
【24h】

Age, Hf isotope and trace element signatures of detrital zircons in the Mesoproterozoic Eriksfjord sandstone, southern Greenland: Are detrital zircons reliable guides to sedimentary provenance and timing of deposition?

机译:格陵兰岛南部中元古代Eriksfjord砂岩中碎屑锆石的年龄,Hf同位素和微量元素特征:碎屑锆石是沉积物源和沉积时间的可靠指南吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Gardar Rift in southern Greenland developed within Palaeoproterozoic rocks of the Ketilidian orogen, near its boundary with the Archaean craton. The Eriksfjord Formation was deposited at c. 1.3 Ga on a basement of c. 1.8 Ga Julianeh?b I-type granite. Detrital zircons from the lower sandstone units shows a range of ages and ?Hf compatible with proto sources within the Archaean craton and the Nagssugtoquidian mobile belt north and east of the craton; zircons that can be attributed to juvenile Ketilidian sources are less abundant. This suggests a predominance of distant sources, probably by recycling of older and no longer preserved cover strata. A significant fraction of c. 1300 Ma zircons have ?Hf between 0 and -38. Rather than originating from a hitherto unknown igneous body within the Gardar Rift, these are interpreted as Palaeoproterozoic to late Archaean zircons that have lost radiogenic lead during diagenesis and post-depositional thermal alteration related to Gardar magmatism. Although the sediments originate from sources within Greenland, the age and initial Hf isotope distribution of Palaeoproterozoic and Archaean zircons mimics that of granitoids from the Fennoscandian Shield. This may reflect parallel evolution and possible long-range exchange of detritus in Proterozoic supercontinent settings. The lesson to be learned is that detrital zircon age data should not be used to constrain the age of sedimentary deposition unless the post-depositional history is well understood, and that recycling of old sediments, long-range transport and parallel evolution of different continents make detrital zircons unreliable indicators of provenance.
机译:格陵兰南部的Gardar裂谷在Ketilidian造山带的古元古代岩石中发展,靠近与古生界克拉通的边界。埃里克斯峡湾组沉积在c。以c为基底的1.3 Ga。 1.8 Ga Julianeh?b I型花岗岩。下部砂岩单元的碎屑锆石显示出一定的年龄范围和ΔHf,与古克拉通和克拉通以北和东部的纳格苏格托基迪安移动带内的原始源兼容。可归因于少年科提里安人的锆石数量较少。这表明遥远的来源占主导地位,可能是通过回收较旧且不再保存的覆盖层。很大一部分c。 1300 Ma锆石的ΔHf在0到-38之间。它们不是起源于Gardar裂谷中迄今未知的火成岩体,而是被解释为古生代至晚古生代锆石,后者在成岩作用和与Gardar岩浆作用有关的沉积后热蚀变过程中失去了放射性铅。尽管沉积物来自格陵兰岛内的来源,但是古元古代和古生锆石的年龄和初始Hf同位素分布与Fennoscandian Shield的花岗岩类相似。这可能反映了元古代超大陆环境中碎屑的平行演化和可能的远距离交换。要吸取的教训是,除非对沉积后的历史有充分的了解,否则不应使用碎屑锆石年龄数据来限制沉积物的沉积年龄,而且旧大陆的沉积物的再循环,远距离迁移和平行演化使得碎屑锆石的物产指标不可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号