...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Associations between adherence to guidelines for antipsychotic dose and health status, side effects, and patient care experiences.
【24h】

Associations between adherence to guidelines for antipsychotic dose and health status, side effects, and patient care experiences.

机译:遵守抗精神病药物剂量指南与健康状况,副作用和患者护理经历之间的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: One approach to improving quality of care is to encourage physicians to follow evidence-based practice guidelines. Examples of evidence-based guidelines are the PORT recommendations for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, few studies have examined the relationship between adherence to guidelines and patient outcomes in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to report the relationship between guideline adherence to antipsychotic medication dose and self-reported health status, side effects, and perceptions of care. RESEARCH DESIGN: This report is based on a subsample of patients from a larger prospective observational study of disabled Massachusetts Medicaid beneficiaries treated for schizophrenia. SUBJECTS: Participants were 329 acutely ill, vulnerable, high-risk Medicaid adult beneficiaries enrolled after visiting any 1 of 8 psychiatric emergency screening teams for hospital admission evaluation. MEASURES: Dose levels, symptoms, and functioning from medical records; self-reports as data collected from BASIS-32, SF-12, and CABHS; and paid health benefit claims for psychiatric treatment were measured. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of the patients in this study had daily antipsychotic doses well above the recommended range, but there was no evidence that their health status was better than those on doses below 1000 CPZ units recommended for acute episodes. High-dose levels had no relationship to baseline symptom profile or referral source. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that health status was better on higher-than-recommended doses, but we cannot conclude that lower doses for some would have led to poorer outcomes. Physicians who believe that higher doses are more therapeutic for patients need to demand rigorous effectiveness research that tests whether there are benefits of higher doses and determine the ratio of those benefits to the clinical costs, including the risk of side effects.
机译:背景:提高护理质量的一种方法是鼓励医生遵循循证实践指南。基于证据的指导方针的示例包括治疗精神分裂症的PORT建议。但是,很少有研究检查在临床环境中遵守指南与患者预后之间的关系。目的:本文的目的是报告坚持抗精神病药物剂量指南与自我报告的健康状况,副作用和护理观念之间的关系。研究设计:本报告是基于对接受精神分裂症治疗的马萨诸塞州残疾人医疗补助受益人的一项较大的前瞻性观察研究的患者子样本。研究对象:参观了8个精神病学紧急筛查小组中的任何1个进行住院入院评估后,招募了329名重病,脆弱,高风险的医疗补助成人受益人。措施:病历中的剂量水平,症状和功能;自我报告为从BASIS-32,SF-12和CABHS收集的数据;并测量了用于精神病治疗的付费健康福利索赔。结果:本研究中约40%的患者每日抗精神病药物剂量远高于推荐范围,但没有证据表明他们的健康状况优于急性发作推荐剂量低于1000 CPZ单位的患者。高剂量水平与基线症状特征或转诊来源无关。结论:没有证据表明使用高于推荐剂量的健康状况会更好,但是我们不能得出结论,对于某些人使用更低的剂量会导致较差的结果。认为高剂量对患者更具治疗作用的医师需要进行严格的有效性研究,以测试高剂量是否有益处,并确定这些益处与临床费用的比率,包括副作用的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号