...
【24h】

Posco v.Hysoc (contd)

机译:波斯科诉海索克案(续)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Korea itself has been a big importer of Japanese coil, but price negotiations are always difficult. The re-rolling company Hysco (formerly Hyundai Pipe) should be a secure customer for HR coil because Posco holds down deliveries of its own coil to Hysco as a means of maintaining a maximum market share for its own downstream CR and coated coil output. This was in part a reaction to being excluded from supplying CR coil to Hysco's affiliate, Hyundai Motor. Hysco complained to the Korean Fair Trade Commission (FTC) that Posco was abusing a monopoly position. It won judgment, Posco was fined, ordered to supply Hysco and make a public apology, but the integrated mill appealed, and won a preliminary stay of judgment pending a final ruling.The two companies compete abroad as well as in their home markets. For instance, in the past they had both delivered electrolytic galvanised coil, to one Malaysian service centre, but in April Posco was reported to supply the whole business with an offer of 5,000 tonnes of EZ coil at US
机译:韩国本身一直是日本卷材的主要进口国,但价格谈判始终很困难。轧钢公司Hysco(以前为Hyundai Pipe)应该是热轧卷的可靠客户,因为Posco拒绝将自己的卷材交付给Hysco,以此来保持自己的下游CR和涂层卷材产量的最大市场份额。这部分是对被排除在向Hysco的分支机构Hyundai Motor供应CR线圈的反应。 Hysco向韩国公平贸易委员会(FTC)抱怨说,浦项制铁正在滥用垄断地位。它赢得了判决,Posco被罚款,下令向Hysco供应并公开道歉,但综合工厂提出上诉,并在最终裁定前赢得了初步判决。两家公司在国外以及在本国市场竞争。例如,过去他们都曾向一个马来西亚服务中心交付过电解镀锌卷材,但据报道,4月,浦项制铁在美国向整个企业提供了5,000吨EZ卷材的报价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号