首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >A comparative analysis of conservation agriculture systems: benefits and challenges of rotations and intercropping in Zimbabwe.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of conservation agriculture systems: benefits and challenges of rotations and intercropping in Zimbabwe.

机译:保护性农业系统的比较分析:津巴布韦轮作和间作的好处和挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increasing soil degradation in southern Africa and the potentially negative effects of climate change demand "greener" solutions to reverse this trend. Conservation agriculture (CA) has been proposed as one of those solutions and field level data show marked benefits of this new cropping system. Nevertheless, the use of rotations and/or associations in CA systems is challenging at both the farm and community level. Intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) with grain legumes, cowpea and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. (Millsp.)), as well as maize rotated with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) and sunnhemp (Crotalaria ochroleuca L.) was studied for up to eight seasons under CA and conventional agriculture in Zimbabwe. The objective of this study, carried out on-farm and on-station, was to highlight the effects of CA systems on some soil quality indicators and crop productivity. Where possible the specific effects of rotation and intercropping was separated and compared with monocropping. The on-station and on-farm results show: an increase of up to 331% in water infiltration, a 31% greater soil carbon in the top 60 cm than on adjacent conventionally ploughed fields, a 6% lower bulk density in the top 10 cm and 32.5-36 t ha-1 less cumulative soil erosion in CA fields after seven cropping seasons compared with the conventional control treatment. The comparative productivity analysis between continuous maize, maize intercropped with cowpea or pigeonpea and maize in rotation with cowpea or sunnhemp, shows marked benefits of rotation especially in CA systems. The benefits of CA especially when rotated with leguminous crops, increase over time, suggesting that there are improvements in soil structure and fertility. However, field level benefits will not increase the overall adoption of rotations and intercropping in CA systems, unless the socio-economic constraints at the farm and community level are addressed.
机译:南部非洲日益严重的土壤退化以及气候变化的潜在负面影响,需要“绿色”解决方案来扭转这一趋势。已经提出了保护性农业(CA)作为解决方案之一,田间水平数据表明这种新型种植系统具有明显的优势。但是,在农场和社区级别,在CA系统中使用轮换和/或关联都具有挑战性。间作玉米(Zea mays L.)与豆类、,豆和木豆(Cajanus cajan L.(Millsp。)),以及与cow豆(Vigna unguiculata L.(Walp))和sunnhemp(Crotalaria ochroleuca L.)轮作的玉米在津巴布韦,在CA和常规农业下进行了长达八个季节的研究。在农场和农场进行的这项研究的目的是要突出CA系统对某些土壤质量指标和作物生产力的影响。在可能的情况下,将轮作和间作的具体效果分开,并与单作进行比较。站上和农场的结果表明:水分渗透最多增加331%,顶部60厘米的土壤碳含量比相邻的传统耕作田高31%,顶部10厘米的土壤密度降低6%与常规对照相比,七个种植季节后,CA田的土壤累积土壤侵蚀量减少了3 cm和32.5-36 t ha -1 。连续玉米,cow豆或木豆间作玉米和cow豆或嫩麻轮作玉米之间的比较生产率分析显示出轮作的明显好处,特别是在CA系统中。尤其是与豆科作物轮作时,CA的好处随着时间的推移而增加,这表明土壤结构和肥力得到了改善。但是,除非解决了农场和社区一级的社会经济限制,否则田间级的收益将不会增加轮作和间作在CA系统中的整体采用率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号