首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >Water use and yields of no-till managed dryland grasspea and yellow pea under different planting configurations
【24h】

Water use and yields of no-till managed dryland grasspea and yellow pea under different planting configurations

机译:不同种植方式下免耕旱地豌豆和黄豌豆的水分利用和产量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Grasspea (GP) (Lathyrus sativus) is a drought-tolerant legume that can be grown for forage and grain. It has potential value to be used as a nitrogen-fixing crop in dryland rotations with non-legume grain crops. However, the agronomy of GP for the Central Great Plains region have not been investigated. The objective of this research was to compare the grain and biomass yield, as well as N accumulation of GP relative to field pea (FP) in two planting configurations. We carried out a 3-year field experiment to compare dryland GP with Admiral yellow field pea (Pisum sativum) in two configurations: (1) a wide row spacing with lower population (WL) with 76-cm rows with 75 kg seeds planted per ha, and (2) a narrower row spacing with a higher population (NH) with 19-cm rows with 136 kg seeds planted per ha. We measured the biomass, grain yield. N content, and soil water use. Our results show that the NH treatment out-yielded the WL treatment in both pea species. The GP had higher yield then FP on the lowest yielding year, while FP yielded better when overall yields were higher. Biomass production was also higher for the NH configuration, and GP was a higher biomass producer than FP over the 3-year study. The GP had higher N concentration in shoots and seed compared to FP, indicating higher N-fixing capacity. The FP matured faster than GP, and had marginally higher grain water use efficiency than GP. Our results show that GP is a viable alternative legume for the Central Great Plains, with comparable yields in low precipitation years. However, the longer growing season required by GP to mature has water use implications in years with reduced water availability in mid to late summer. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:豌豆(Lathyrus sativus)是一种耐旱的豆类,可以种植饲料和谷物。它具有潜力,可在非豆类谷物作物的旱地轮作中用作固氮作物。但是,尚未研究中部大平原地区的GP农艺。这项研究的目的是比较两种种植方式下相对于豌豆(FP)的谷物和生物量产量以及GP的氮累积量。我们进行了为期3年的田间试验,比较了旱地GP和海军上将黄豌豆(Pisum sativum)的两种配置:(1)行距较低的宽行距(WL),行距76厘米,每株种植75公斤种子(2)行间距更窄,人口(NH)更高,行长19厘米,每公顷种植136公斤种子。我们测量了生物量,谷物产量。氮含量和土壤水分利用。我们的结果表明,在两种豌豆品种中,NH处理均胜过WL处理。 GP的单产最高,而FP在最低的年份高,而FP在整体单产较高时则表现更好。在为期3年的研究中,NH结构的生物质产量也较高,GP的生物质产量高于FP。与FP相比,GP在芽和种子中的N含量更高,表明其固氮能力更高。 FP的成熟度比GP快,并且谷物水分利用效率略高于GP。我们的结果表明,GP是中部大平原的可行豆类替代品,在低降水年中单产可比。但是,GP要求成熟的较长生长期会影响水的使用,而这几年的用水量会在夏季中旬至夏末减少。由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号