首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Comparing carbon sequestration in temperate freshwater wetlandTI Comparing carbon sequestration in temperate freshwater wetland communities
【24h】

Comparing carbon sequestration in temperate freshwater wetlandTI Comparing carbon sequestration in temperate freshwater wetland communities

机译:比较温带淡水湿地中的固碳TI比较温带淡水湿地中的固碳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

High productivity and waterlogged conditions make many freshwater wetlands significant carbon sinks. Most wetland carbon studies focus on boreal peatlands, however, with less attention paid to other climates and to the effects of hydrogeomorphic settings and the importance of wetland vegetation communities on carbon sequestration. This study compares six temperate wetland communities in Ohio that belong to two distinct hydrogeomorphic types: an isolated depressional wetland site connected to the groundwater table, and a riverine flow-through wetland site that receives water from an agricultural watershed. Three cores were extracted in each community and analyzed for total carbon content to determine the soil carbon pool. Sequestration rates were determined by radiometric dating with 137Cs and 210Pb on a set of composite cores extracted in each of the six communities. Cores were also extracted in uplands adjacent to the wetlands at each site. Wetland communities had accretion rates ranging from 3.0 to 6.2 mm yr-1. The depressional wetland sites had higher (P < 0.001) organic content (146 +/- 4.2 gC kg-1) and lower (P < 0.001) bulk density (0.55 +/- 0.01 Mg m-3) than the riverine ones (50.1 +/- 6.9 gC kg-1 and 0.74 +/- 0.06 Mg m-3). The soil carbon was 9899% organic in the isolated depressional wetland communities and 8598% organic in the riverine ones. The depressional wetland communities sequestered 317 +/- 93 gC m-2 yr-1, more (P < 0.01) than the riverine communities that sequestered 140 +/- 16 gC m-2 yr-1. The highest sequestration rate was found in the Quercus palustris forested wetland community (473 gC m-2 yr-1), while the wetland community dominated by water lotus (Nelumbo lutea) was the most efficient of the riverine communities, sequestering 160 gC m-2 yr-1. These differences in sequestration suggest the importance of addressing wetland types and communities in more detail when assessing the role of wetlands as carbon sequestering systems in global carbon budgets.
机译:高生产力和内涝条件使许多淡水湿地成为重要的碳汇。大多数湿地碳研究都集中在北方的泥炭地上,但是很少关注其他气候以及水文地貌环境的影响以及湿地植被群落对固碳的重要性。这项研究比较了俄亥俄州的六个温带湿地群落,它们属于两种截然不同的水文地貌类型:与地下水位相连的孤立的洼地湿地站点和从农业流域接收水的流经河流的湿地站点。在每个社区中提取了三个核心,并分析了总碳含量,以确定土壤碳库。通过对六个社区中每个社区提取的一组复合岩心上的137Cs和210Pb进行辐射定年,确定了固存率。在每个地点的湿地附近的高地也提取了岩心。湿地社区的增生率介于3.0至6.2 mm yr-1之间。 depression陷湿地站点的有机物含量(146±4.2 gC kg-1)较高(P <0.001),堆积密度(0.55 +/- 0.01 Mg m-3)较低(P <0.001)(50.1±0.5 Mg m-3) +/- 6.9 gC kg-1和0.74 +/- 0.06 Mg m-3)。在偏远的洼地湿地群落中,土壤碳为9899%的有机碳,在沿河地区为8598%。洼地湿地群落的固存量为317 +/- 93 gC m-2 yr-1,比封存140 +/- 16 gC m-2 yr-1的河流社区多(P <0.01)。封存率最高的是栎木森林湿地社区(473 gC m-2 yr-1),而以水莲(Nelumbo lutea)为主的湿地社区是最有效的河沿社区,封存了160 gC m- 2年1。这些固存的差异表明,在评估湿地在全球碳预算中作为碳固存系统的作用时,更详细地解决湿地类型和群落的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号