...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Forest-flood relation still tenuous - comment on 'Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world' by C. J. A. Bradshaw, N.S. Sodi, K. S.-H. Peh and B.W. Brook.
【24h】

Forest-flood relation still tenuous - comment on 'Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world' by C. J. A. Bradshaw, N.S. Sodi, K. S.-H. Peh and B.W. Brook.

机译:森林与洪水之间的关系仍然微弱-评论C. J. A. Bradshaw,N.S.的“全球证据表明,森林砍伐加剧了发展中国家的洪灾风险和严重性”。 Sodi,K.S.-H. Peh和B.W.溪。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent paper in this journal, Bradshaw and colleagues analyse country statistics on flood characteristics, land cover and land cover change, and conclude that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world. The study addresses an important and long-standing question, but we identify important flaws. Principal among these are difficulties in interpreting country statistics and the correlation between population and floods. We review current knowledge, which suggests that the removal of trees does not affect large flood events, although associated landscape changes can under some circumstances. Reanalysis of the data analysed by Bradshaw and colleagues shows that population density alone already explains up to 83% of the variation in reported flood occurrences, considerably more than forest cover or deforestation (<10%). Feasible explanations for this statistical finding - whether spurious or causative - are not difficult to conceive. We, therefore, consider the conclusion of Bradshaw and colleagues to be unsupported. However, their study is a valuable first step to show how these or similar flood data might be used to further explore the relationship between land cover and flooding.
机译:Bradshaw及其同事在最近发表在该期刊上的一篇论文中,分析了有关洪水特征,土地覆盖和土地覆盖变化的国家统计数据,并得出结论,森林砍伐加剧了发展中国家的洪灾风险和严重性。该研究解决了一个重要且长期存在的问题,但我们发现了重要的缺陷。其中最主要的是难以解释国家统计数据以及人口与洪水之间的关系。我们回顾了当前的知识,这表明,尽管在某些情况下相关的景观变化可能会消除树木,但不会影响大洪水事件。对Bradshaw及其同事分析的数据进行的重新分析表明,仅人口密度已经解释了多达83%的报告洪水发生率的变化,远远超过了森林覆盖率或森林砍伐率(<10%)。对于这个统计发现的可行解释,无论是虚假的还是因果的,都不难想象。因此,我们认为Bradshaw及其同事的结论不受支持。但是,他们的研究是有价值的第一步,表明如何使用这些或类似的洪水数据来进一步探索土地覆盖与洪水之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号