...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition
【24h】

Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition

机译:对比环境中松木和硬木垃圾的长期动态:走向分解的整体模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analysed data on mass loss after five years of decomposition in the field from both fine root and leaf litters from two highly contrasting trees, Drypetes glauca, a tropical hardwood tree from Puerto Rico, and pine species from North America as part of the Long-Term Intersite Decomposition Experiment (LIDET). LIDET is a reciprocal litterbag study involving the transplanting of litter from 27 species across 28 sites in North and Central America reflecting a wide variety of natural and managed ecosystems and climates, from Arctic tundra to tropical rainforest. After 5 years, estimated k-values ranged from 0.032 to 3.734, lengths of Phase I (to 20% mass remaining) from 0.49 to 47.92 years, and fractional mass remaining from 0 to 0.81. Pine litter decomposed more slowly than Drypetes litter, supporting the notion of strong control of substrate quality over decomposition rates. Climate exerted strong and consistent effects on decomposition. Neither mean annual temperature or precipitation alone explained the global pattern of decomposition; variables including both moisture availability and temperature (i.e. actual evapotranspiration and DEFAC from the CENTURY model) were generally more robust than single variables. Across the LIDET range, decomposition of fine roots exhibited a Q(10) of 2 and was more predictable than that of leaves, which had a higher Q(10) and greater variability. Roots generally decomposed more slowly than leaves, regardless of genus, but the ratio of above- to belowground decomposition rates differed sharply across ecosystem types. Finally, Drypetes litter decomposed much more rapidly than pine litter in 'broadleaved habitats' than in 'conifer habitats', evidence for a 'home-field advantage' for this litter. These results collectively suggest that relatively simple models can predict decomposition based on litter quality and regional climate, but that ecosystem-specific problems may add complications. [References: 42]
机译:我们分析了野外经过五年分解后的质量损失数据,该数据来自两棵高对比度树:Drypetes glauca,来自波多黎各的热带硬木树和来自北美的松树种(作为Long-术语站点间分解实验(LIDET)。 LIDET是一项双向的垃圾袋研究,涉及从北美苔原到热带雨林的北美和中美洲28个地点的27种物种的垃圾移植,反映了各种各样的自然和可管理的生态系统和气候。 5年后,估计的k值范围为0.032至3.734,第一阶段的长度(至剩余质量的20%)为0.49至47.92年,质量分数保持为0至0.81。松木垃圾的分解速度比Drypetes垃圾慢,支持了对分解速度进行严格控制的基质质量的观点。气候对分解产生了强烈而持续的影响。每年的平均温度或降水都不能单独解释全球的分解模式。包括水分可用性和温度的变量(即CENTURY模型中的实际蒸散量和DEFAC)通常比单个变量更可靠。在整个LIDET范围内,细根的分解表现出的Q(10)为2,比叶子的可预测性更高,叶片的Q(10)更高且变异性更大。不论属哪种,根的分解速度通常都比叶慢,但是不同生态系统类型的地上与地下分解速率之比差异很大。最后,与“针叶树栖息地”相比,“阔叶植物栖息地”中的枯枝落叶凋落物的分解速度比松树凋落物快得多,这证明了这种凋落物具有“家园优势”。这些结果共同表明,相对简单的模型可以基于垃圾质量和区域气候来预测分解,但是特定于生态系统的问题可能会增加复杂性。 [参考:42]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号