...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions
【24h】

Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions

机译:物种会去哪里?将气候建模的新进展纳入物种分布的预测中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bioclimatic models are the primary tools for simulating the impact of climate change on species distributions. Part of the uncertainty in the output of these models results from uncertainty in projections of future climates. To account for this, studies often simulate species responses to climates predicted by more than one climate model and/or emission scenario. One area of uncertainty, however, has remained unexplored: internal climate model variability. By running a single climate model multiple times, but each time perturbing the initial state of the model slightly, different but equally valid realizations of climate will be produced. In this paper, we identify how ongoing improvements in climate models can be used to provide guidance for impacts studies. In doing so we provide the first assessment of the extent to which this internal climate model variability generates uncertainty in projections of future species distributions, compared with variability between climate models. We obtained data on 13 realizations from three climate models (three from CSIRO Mark2 v3.0, four from GISS AOM, and six from MIROC v3.2) for two time periods: current (1985-1995) and future (2025-2035). Initially, we compared the simulated values for each climate variable (P, T-max, T-min, and T-mean) for the current period to observed climate data. This showed that climates simulated by realizations from the same climate model were more similar to each other than to realizations from other models. However, when projected into the future, these realizations followed different trajectories and the values of climate variables differed considerably within and among climate models. These had pronounced effects on the projected distributions of nine Australian butterfly species when modelled using the BIOCLIM component of DIVA-GIS. Our results show that internal climate model variability can lead to substantial differences in the extent to which the future distributions of species are projected to change. These can be greater than differences resulting from between-climate model variability. Further, different conclusions regarding the vulnerability of species to climate change can be reached due to internal model variability. Clearly, several climate models, each represented by multiple realizations, are required if we are to adequately capture the range of uncertainty associated with projecting species distributions in the future.
机译:生物气候模型是模拟气候变化对物种分布影响的主要工具。这些模型输出的不确定性部分来自对未来气候的预测不确定性。考虑到这一点,研究经常模拟物种对多种气候模型和/或排放情景所预测的气候的反应。然而,不确定性的一个领域仍待探索:内部气候模型的可变性。通过多次运行一个气候模型,但每次都会稍微干扰模型的初始状态,将产生不同但同样有效的气候实现。在本文中,我们确定了如何利用气候模型的持续改进为影响研究提供指导。与气候模型之间的可变性相比,我们这样做的目的是对这种内部气候模型可变性在未来物种分布的预测中产生不确定性的程度进行首次评估。我们从两个时间段(当前(1985-1995年)和未来(2025-2035年))的三个气候模型(CSIRO Mark2 v3.0中的三个,GISS AOM中的四个,MIROC v3.2中的六个)获得了13个实现的数据。 。最初,我们将当期每个气候变量(P,T-max,T-min和T-mean)的模拟值与观测到的气候数据进行了比较。这表明,由相同气候模型的实现模拟的气候彼此之间的相似性要比与其他模型的实现更为相似。但是,当预计到未来时,这些认识将遵循不同的轨迹,而且气候模型内部和之间的气候变量值也存在很大差异。当使用DIVA-GIS的BIOCLIM组件进行建模时,这对9种澳大利亚蝴蝶物种的预计分布产生了明显影响。我们的结果表明,内部气候模型的可变性可能导致物种的未来分布变化的程度存在实质性差异。这些差异可能大于气候之间模型差异所导致的差异。此外,由于内部模型的可变性,可以得出有关物种对气候变化的脆弱性的不同结论。显然,如果我们将来要充分捕获与预测物种分布有关的不确定性范围,则需要几个气候模型,每个模型都由多个实现表示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号