...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Testing Postural Stability: Are the Star Excursion Balance Test and Biodex Balance System Limits of Stability Tests Consistent?
【24h】

Testing Postural Stability: Are the Star Excursion Balance Test and Biodex Balance System Limits of Stability Tests Consistent?

机译:测试姿势稳定性:恒星漂移平衡测试和Biodex平衡系统稳定性测试极限是否一致?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There are a variety of options to test postural stability; however many physical tests lack validity information. Two tests of postural stability - the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and Biodex Balance System Limits of Stability Test (LOS) - were examined to determine if similar components of balance were measured. Healthy adults (n = 31) completed the LOS (levels 6 and 12) and SEBT (both legs). SEBT directions were offset by 180 degrees to approximate LOS direction. Correlations and partial correlations controlling for height were analyzed. Correlations were significant for SEBT 45 degrees and LOS back-left (6: r = -0.41; 12: r = -0.42; p < 0.05), SEBT 90 degrees and LOS 6 left (r = -0.51, p < 0.05), SEBT 135 degrees and LOS 6 front-left (r = -0.53, p < 0.05), SEBT overall and LOS 6 overall (r = -0.43, p < 0.05). Partial correlations were significant for SEBT 90 degrees and LOS 6 left (r(SEBT,LOS.H) = -0.45, p < 0.05) and SEBT 135 degrees and LOS 6 front-left (r(SEBT,LOS.H) = -0.51, p < 0.05), and SEBT overall and LOS 6 overall (r(SEBT,LOS.H) = -0.37, p < 0.05). These findings indicate the tests seem to assess different components of balance. Research is needed to determine and define what specific components of balance are being assessed. Care must be taken when choosing balance tests to best match the test to the purpose of testing (fall risk, athletic performance, etc.). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:有多种选择可测试姿势稳定性;但是许多物理测试缺乏有效性信息。进行了两项姿势稳定性测试-星际游览平衡测试(SEBT)和Biodex平衡系统稳定性极限测试(LOS)-以确定是否测量了相似的平衡成分。健康的成年人(n = 31)完成了LOS(6和12级)和SEBT(双腿)。 SEBT方向偏移180度以近似LOS方向。分析了控制高度的相关性和偏相关性。 SEBT 45度和LOS后左(6:r = -0.41; 12:r = -0.42; p <0.05),SEBT 90度和LOS 6左(r = -0.51,p <0.05)的相关性显着, SEBT 135度和LOS 6左前(r = -0.53,p <0.05),总体SEBT和LOS 6总体(r = -0.43,p <0.05)。 SEBT 90度和LOS 6左(r(SEBT,LOS.H)= -0.45,p <0.05)和SEBT 135度和LOS 6左前(r(SEBT,LOS.H)=-分别为0.51,p <0.05)和SEBT总体以及LOS 6(r(SEBT,LOS.H)= -0.37,p <0.05)。这些发现表明测试似乎评估了平衡的不同组成部分。需要进行研究以确定和定义要评估的平衡的特定组成部分。选择平衡测试时要特别注意,以使其与测试目的最相符(跌倒风险,运动表现等)。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号