...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Measuring movement fluency during the sit-to-walk task
【24h】

Measuring movement fluency during the sit-to-walk task

机译:在坐着步行任务中测量运动流畅度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Restoring movement fluency is a key focus for physical rehabilitation; it's measurement, however, lacks objectivity. The purpose of this study was to find whether measurable movement fluency variables differed between groups of adults with different movement abilities whilst performing the sit-to-walk (STW) movement. The movement fluency variables were: (1) hesitation during movement (reduction in forward velocity of the centre of mass; CoM), (2) coordination (percentage of temporal overlap of joint rotations) and (3) smoothness (number of inflections in the CoM jerk signal). Methods: Kinematic data previously collected for another study were extracted for three groups: older adults (. n=. 18), older adults at risk of falling (OARF, n=. 18), and younger adults (. n=. 20). Each subject performed the STW movement freely while a motion analysis system tracked 11 body segments. The fluency variables were derived from the processed kinematic data and tested for group variation using analysis of variance. Findings: All three variables showed statistically significant differences among the groups. Hesitation (. F=. 15.11, p<. 0.001) was greatest in the OARF 47.5% (SD 18.0), compared to older adults 30.3% (SD 15.9) and younger adults 20.8% (SD 11.4). Co-ordination (. F=. 44.88, p<. 0.001) was lowest for the OARF (6.93%, SD 10.99) compared to both the young (31.21%, SD 5.48) and old (26.24%, SD 5.84). Smoothness (. F=. 35.96, p<. 0.001) was best in the younger adults, 18.3 (SD 5.2) inflections, compared to the old, 42.5 (SD 11.5) and OARF, 44.25 (SD 7.29). Interpretation: Hesitation, co-ordination and smoothness may be valid indicators of movement fluency in adults, with important consequences for research and clinical practice.
机译:背景:恢复运动流畅性是身体康复的重点。它的度量缺乏客观性。这项研究的目的是发现在进行坐着步行(STW)运动时,具有不同运动能力的成年人群体之间可测量的运动流畅度变量是否不同。运动流畅度变量为:(1)运动过程中的犹豫(降低质心的向前速度; CoM),(2)协调性(关节旋转的时间重叠百分比)和(3)平滑度(关节中的弯曲次数) CoM跳动信号)。方法:提取先前为另一项研究收集的运动学数据,分为三组:老年人(。n =。18),有跌倒危险的老年人(OARF,n =。18)和年轻人(。n =。20) 。每个对象自由地执行STW运动,同时运动分析系统跟踪11个身体部位。流利度变量来自处理后的运动学数据,并使用方差分析测试了组差异。结果:这三个变量在各组之间显示出统计学上的显着差异。 OARF 47.5%(SD 18.0)中的犹豫(。F =。15.11,p <.0.001)最大,相比之下,老年人(30.3%(SD 15.9)和年轻人20.8%(SD 11.4)。与年轻人(31.21%,SD 5.48)和老年人(26.24%,SD 5.84)相比,OARF(.F = .44.88,p <.0.001)的协调性最低(6.93%,SD 10.99)。平滑度(。F =。35.96,p <。0.001)在年轻人中(18.3(SD 5.2)拐点)是最好的,而老年人(42.5(SD 11.5)和OARF是44.25(SD 7.29)。解释:犹豫,协调和流畅可能是成年人运动流利性的有效指标,对研究和临床实践具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号