...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Identifying gait events without a force plate during running: a comparison of methods.
【24h】

Identifying gait events without a force plate during running: a comparison of methods.

机译:识别跑步过程中没有压力板的步态事件:方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper presents a comparison of four different methods of identifying the times of foot-strike and toe-off during running based on gait marker trajectories. The event times predicted by the methods were compared to those identified using a force plate for both over-ground and treadmill running. The effect of using different threshold values for the detection of gait events using force plate data was also investigated, and as a result, all assessments of event detection accuracy were based on a cut-off value of 10N. The most accurate method of foot-strike detection depended on whether the runner landed with a rear- or a mid-foot strike. For rear-foot-strike running, the best method of identifying foot-strike used the vertical acceleration profile of the posterior heel distal marker and the vertical position profile of the hallux marker. For mid-foot-strike running, the best method of identifying foot-strike used the vertical velocity profile of the mean positions of the posterior heel distal marker and a marker midway between the second and third metatarsal heads. The most accurate method of identifying toe-off did not depend on type of foot-strike and was based on the vertical acceleration and position profiles of the hallux marker.
机译:本文比较了基于步态标记轨迹识别跑步过程中脚部敲打和脚趾离开时间的四种不同方法。将通过这些方法预测的事件时间与使用测力板在地面和跑步机上运行的时间进行比较。还研究了使用测力板数据使用不同阈值检测步态事件的效果,结果,所有事件检测准确性的评估均基于10N的临界值。探查脚部震动的最准确方法取决于跑步者是在后脚踩中还是脚中踩时着陆。对于后足敲打跑步,识别足部敲打的最佳方法是使用后跟远侧标记的垂直加速度曲线和拇指标记的垂直位置曲线。对于脚中部撞击跑步,识别脚部撞击的最佳方法是使用后跟远侧标志物和第二和第三third骨头之间的中间标志物的平均位置的垂直速度分布。识别脚趾的最准确方法并不取决于脚踩的类型,而取决于拇指标记的垂直加速度和位置轮廓。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号