...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Kinetic asymmetry in transfemoral amputees while performing sit to stand and stand to sit movements.
【24h】

Kinetic asymmetry in transfemoral amputees while performing sit to stand and stand to sit movements.

机译:经股截肢者在进行坐立和立坐运动时的动力学不对称。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Transitional movements are a determinant of functional independence and have limited study in amputees. Microprocessor prosthetic knees' abilities to assist transfemoral amputees with sitting and standing have not been studied. Through cross-sectional study, 21 transfemoral amputees, divided into 3 groups of 7 by knee type (power knee, C-leg, Mauch SNS) and 7 non-amputee controls (n=28) performed sit to stand and stand to sit while kinematic and kinetic data were recorded. Transfemoral amputees can stand (1.6-2.0s) and sit (2.1-2.8s) at rates comparable to controls (1.6s). Controls' ground reaction force (GRF) and knee moment production was <7% asymmetric and superior to amputees' during both movements. For sit to stand, amputees' asymmetry for GRF ranged from 53 to 69% and 110 to 124% for knee moments. For stand to sit, amputees' asymmetry for GRF ranged from 32 to 60% and 84 to 114% for knee moments. Hip moment asymmetry for sit to stand was less for control (21%) and power knee (34%) groups than that produced by the Mauch SNS (59%) group. For stand to sit, hip moment production for the Mauch SNS (47%) and C-leg groups (71%) were more asymmetric than controls (19%). In the majority of cases transfemoral amputees do not load their prosthesis extensively for standing up or sitting down. Therefore, this transitional movement is currently a one-legged task, which increases stress on the sound limb. Generally, the prosthetic knees studied did not produce a significant knee moment in either task. Although most differences between knee groups were not statistically significant, differences may be clinically meaningful on an individual basis.
机译:过渡运动是功能独立性的决定因素,在被截肢者中研究有限。尚未研究过微处理器假肢辅助经股截肢者坐着和站着的能力。通过横断面研究,将21个经股截肢者分为3组,每组7个,分别按膝盖类型(强力膝盖,C型腿,Mauch SNS)和7个非截肢者对照(n = 28)进行坐立和立坐。记录运动学和动力学数据。经股截肢者可以站立(1.6-2.0s)和坐位(2.1-2.8s),其速度与对照组(1.6s)相当。在这两次运动中,对照组的地面反作用力(GRF)和膝力矩产生均小于7%,并且优于截肢者。对于坐直站立,被截肢者对于GRF的不对称性在膝力矩范围内为53%至69%,在110%至124%之间。对于站立坐姿,被截肢者对于GRF的不对称范围在32%至60%之间,对于膝力矩不对称范围在84%至114%之间。对照组(21%)和屈膝(34%)组的坐直站立时髋部不对称性比毛赫·SNS组(59%)低。对于站立坐姿,Mauch SNS(47%)和C腿组(71%)的髋部力矩产生比对照组(19%)更不对称。在大多数情况下,经股截肢者不能将其假体广泛地站立或坐下。因此,这种过渡运动目前是一条腿的任务,这会增加健全肢体的压力。通常,在任何一项任务中,研究的假肢膝盖均不会产生明显的膝力矩。尽管膝关节组之间的大多数差异在统计学上均无统计学意义,但这些差异在个体基础上可能具有临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号