...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Locomotion in restricted space: kinematic and electromyographic analysis of stoopwalking and crawling.
【24h】

Locomotion in restricted space: kinematic and electromyographic analysis of stoopwalking and crawling.

机译:受限空间中的运动:步态和爬行的运动学和肌电图分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Stoopwalking and crawling are compulsory gait techniques in some occupational settings, as in low-seam coal mines (where vertical space may be less than 122 cm). Nine participants, six males and three females (mean=35 years+17 SD), participated in a study examining kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) responses to natural cadence stoopwalking, four-point crawling (all fours), and two-point crawling (knees only). EMG data were collected from knee extensors and flexors, and a motion analysis system was used to obtain kinematic data. The average gait velocity for stoopwalking was 1.01 (+/-0.32)m/s with an average cadence of 112.8 steps/min and stride length of 1.04 m. Four-point crawling velocity averaged 0.50 (+/-0.20)m/s, with average cadence of 86.3 steps/min and stride length of 0.69m. Two-point crawling exhibited the slowest velocity (0.32m/s) and shortest stride length (0.40 m); however, cadence was greater than four-point crawling (96.8 steps/min). EMG findings included prolonged contraction of both knee extensors and flexors (compared to normative data on normal walking), increased relative activity SD of the flexors (versus extensors) in two-point crawling, and decreased thigh muscle activity in four-point crawling. Interlimb coordination in four-point crawling trials indicated trot-like, no limb pairing, and near pace-like limb contact patterns. Presence or absence of kneepads had no impact on kinematic or EMG measures (p>0.05); however, subjects complained of discomfort without kneepads (especially in two-point crawling). Results of this study have implications for work performed in underground coal mines, as well as emergency or evacuation considerations.
机译:在某些职业环境中,例如在低煤层煤矿(垂直空间可能小于122厘米)中,踩踏和爬行是必不可少的步态技术。九名参与者(六名男性和三名女性(平均年龄为35岁+ 17 SD))参加了一项研究,研究了运动学和肌电图(EMG)对自然节奏踏步,四点爬行(均为四肢)和两点爬行(仅膝盖)。从膝盖伸肌和屈肌收集肌电数据,并使用运动分析系统获得运动学数据。步态走步的平均步态速度为1.01(+/- 0.32)m / s,平均节奏为112.8步/分钟,步幅为1.04 m。四点爬行速度平均为0.50(+/- 0.20)m / s,平均节奏为86.3步/分钟,步幅为0.69m。两点爬行表现出最低的速度(0.32m / s)和最短的步幅(0.40m)。但是,脚踏圈速要大于四点爬网(96.8步/分钟)。 EMG的发现包括:膝关节伸肌和屈肌的收缩时间延长(与正常步行的正常数据相比);两点爬行时屈肌(相对于伸肌)的相对活动度SD升高;四点爬行时大腿肌肉活动性降低。四点爬行试验的肢体协调表明小跑状,无肢体配对和接近步速的肢体接触方式。膝垫的存在与否对运动学或肌电图测量均无影响(p> 0.05);但是,受试者抱怨没有护膝(特别是两点爬行)的不适感。这项研究的结果对地下煤矿的工作以及紧急情况或疏散情况都有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号