...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History >PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF POSTCRANIAL SKELETAL MORPHOLOGY IN DIDELPHID MARSUPIALS
【24h】

PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF POSTCRANIAL SKELETAL MORPHOLOGY IN DIDELPHID MARSUPIALS

机译:后肢骨骼中颅后骨骼形态的系统发育分析

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study I provide a phylogenetic hypothesis for didelphid Marsupials including a suite of 114 postcranial characters. The postcranial evidence was cladistically analyzed separately and concatenated with a nonmolecular data set previously published (71 cranio-dental-external characters). A combined analysis was done including published IRBP (interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein, 1158 bp), DMP-1 (dentin matrix protein 1, 1176 bp), and RAG-1 (recombinase-activating gene, 2790 bp) sequences to the nonmolecular data set. In order to compare and evaluate the influence of the inclusion of postcranial morphology to previous hypotheses, the taxon sampling of didelphine ingroup was almost similar to the one used in recent series of papers on didelphid phylogeny. The postcranial information includes 48 characters from the axial skeleton, 37 from the anterior limb, and 29 from the posterior limb. I present anatomical descriptions for each postcranial character, adding details of different conditions observed among didelphine ingroup, as well as some functional implications.Different hypotheses that are discussed as polymorphic characters are alternatively treated as composite entries (CO) and transformation series (TS) in morphological and combined analyses.Different codings of polymorphic postcranial characters produce topologies that in general are not contradictory. The principal difference is the loss of resolution of trees in TS analysis,compared to CO analysis in postcranial evidence, whereas the support values were in general low in both codings. The topology obtained from postcranial evidence supported some already recovered relationships, such as the monophyly of the large opossums (Didelphis, Philander,Chironectes, Lutreolina, and Metachirus), and several polytypic groups such as Didelphis,Monodelphis, Marmosops, Thylamys, Micoureus, and Philander. Additionally, the intermediate position of Hyladelphys between calorumyines and didelphines is kept in CO analysis. The inclusion of the postcranial data set to previous nonmolecular evidence causes little incongruence, although some modifications in the topology and support values were detected.The effect of different codings of polymorphic characters was similar respect to the postcranialonly data set.
机译:在这项研究中,我为双足有袋动物提供了系统发育假设,其中包括一组114个颅后特征。对颅后证据分别进行了共阴分析,并与先前发表的非分子数据集(71个颅骨-牙齿-外部特征)连接在一起。进行了组合分析,包括发布到非分子数据集的IRBP(感光体间类视黄醇结合蛋白,1158 bp),DMP-1(牙本质基质蛋白1,1176 bp)和RAG-1(重组酶激活基因,2790 bp)序列。 。为了比较和评估颅后形态的纳入对先前假说的影响,对二甲苯啡类群的分类单元采样几乎与最近有关二蝶蚜系统发育的系列论文中所使用的相似。颅后信息包括来自轴向骨骼的48个字符,来自前肢的37个字符和来自后肢的29个字符。我提供了每个颅后特征的解剖学描述,添加了在二氢吗啡组中观察到的不同状况的详细信息以及一些功能含义。被讨论为多态性特征的不同假设也可以作为复合词条(CO)和转化序列(TS)处理。形态分析和组合分析。多态后颅骨字符的不同编码产生的拓扑通常并不矛盾。主要差异是TS分析中树木的分辨率损失,与颅后证据中的CO分析相比,而两种编码中的支持值通常都较低。从颅后证据中获得的拓扑结构支持了一些已经恢复的关系,例如大型负鼠(Didelphis,Philander,Chironectes,Lutreolina和Metachirus)的单系性,以及几个多型群体,例如Didelphis,Monodelphis,Marmosops,Thylamys,Micoureus和菲兰德。此外,Hyladelphys在花色胺和二苯乙酮之间的中间位置保留在CO分析中。将颅后数据集包含到以前的非分子证据中几乎不会导致不一致,尽管检测到拓扑结构和支持值发生了一些变化。多态性状的不同编码方式的影响与仅颅后数据集相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号