...
首页> 外文期刊>Erdkunde >COMPARATIVE CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON PROCESSES OF INTEGRATION IN RURAL BOLIVIA, IVORY COAST AND INDONESIA
【24h】

COMPARATIVE CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON PROCESSES OF INTEGRATION IN RURAL BOLIVIA, IVORY COAST AND INDONESIA

机译:比较文化地理学:对农村玻利维亚,象牙海岸和印度尼西亚一体化进程的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In many tropical countries, areas of natural forest are currently being further cleared and cultivated in order to offer opportunities for development to a growing population. The question arises as to how the migrants affect local structures within the context of their cultural, social and economic activities and hence influence the use of land. In order to examine this question, it is necessary to consider how socio-cultural co-existence and economic relations in the settlements between migrants ofdiffering origins and ethnic groups manifest themselves. Therefore this article compares processes of integration in selected settlement areas in Bolivia, Ivory Coast and Indonesia. The comparative study is based on an empirical survey, which is gearedto the sociological theory on integration. The approach follows EsSER's concept of Integration (2001) which formulates clear criteria for the analysis. According to these criteria, aspects of systems integration (economy, politics, societal community, fiduciary system) are considered on the one hand, whilst on the other hand, integration within the social structure is analysed on the basis of four categories (cultural adaptation, positioning, interaction, identification). It can be shown that the processes of migration in the selected areas are similar and the general cultural, national and regional conditions essentially reveal few differences. The expectation that the processes of integration would differ due to the general conditions of the nationaland regional cultural areas in Bolivia, Ivory Coast and Indonesia, has not been confirmed. Furthermore, it has been clearly demonstrated that non-integration has negative consequences for the use of resources. The general assumption that ethnic homogeneity tends to have an integrating effect, while heterogeneity initiates non-integration is underlined by this study. It is explained that the research villages can be classified on the basis of their demographic structure, the processes of integration and ethnic stratification, largely independently of their location in a cultural area.
机译:在许多热带国家,目前正在进一步清理和种植天然林区,以便为不断增长的人口提供发展机会。人们提出了一个问题,即移民如何在其文化,社会和经济活动的范围内影响当地结构,从而影响土地的使用。为了研究这个问题,有必要考虑在异族和族裔移民之间的定居点中社会文化共存和经济关系如何表现出来。因此,本文比较了玻利维亚,科特迪瓦和印度尼西亚选定定居点地区的整合过程。比较研究是基于经验调查的,该调查适用于关于整合的社会学理论。该方法遵循EsSER的“集成”(Integration)概念(2001),该概念为分析提出了明确的标准。根据这些标准,一方面要考虑系统整合的各个方面(经济,政治,社会共同体,受托制度),另一方面,要根据四个类别(文化适应,定位,互动,识别)。可以看出,选定地区的迁徙过程是相似的,总体文化,民族和区域条件基本上没有什么区别。由于玻利维亚,科特迪瓦和印度尼西亚的国家和地区文化地区的总体情况,人们认为融合的过程会有所不同的期望尚未得到证实。此外,已经清楚地表明,不整合对资源的使用有负面影响。这项研究强调了种族同质化趋向于具有整合作用而异质性引发非融合化的一般假设。可以解释的是,可以根据村庄的人口结构,融合过程和种族分层来对研究村庄进行分类,而这很大程度上与他们在文化区域中的位置无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号