...
首页> 外文期刊>Inwood >Cornered - Forestry standard worthless without FSC
【24h】

Cornered - Forestry standard worthless without FSC

机译:陷入困境-没有FSC的林业标准毫无价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When the New Zealand Forest Owners Association (FOA) suddenly published a 'National Standard' last year, it managed to alienate environmental groups, unsettle the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and put at risk its inclusion in any future initiatives. Even worse, the unaccredited standard is about as much use as a chocolate teapot in providing the certification credentials essential to success in environmentally savvy export markets. AFTER FIVE YEARS OF TRYING TO develop a national forestry standardbased on Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) guidelines, which resulted in a protracted impasse between the economic and environmental chambers, the FOA suddenly spat the dummy last June and published a 'National Standard for Environmental Certification ofWell-Managed Plantation Forests in New Zealand'. The unexpected move resulted in members of the environmental chamber formally requesting a review of the FOAs membership of the FSC general assembly. The association now faces a hard road back trying to re-engage the environmentalists in any process leading to international accreditation of the standard by the FSC or a similar body.
机译:去年,当新西兰森林所有者协会(FOA)突然发布“国家标准”时,它疏远了环保组织,动摇了森林管理委员会(FSC),并冒着将其纳入任何未来计划的危险。更糟糕的是,未经认证的标准在提供认证证书方面的用途与巧克力茶壶差不多,巧克力认证证书是在环保型出口市场上取得成功所必需的。经过五年的尝试,根据森林管理委员会(FSC)指南制定了国家林业标准,导致经济和环境部门之间陷入了长期僵局,FOA于去年6月突然吐口水,并发布了“国家环境认证标准”新西兰管理完善的人工林”。出乎意料的举动导致环境委员会成员正式要求对FSC大会FOA成员资格进行审查。该协会现在面临艰难的道路,试图重新促使环保主义者参与任何导致FSC或类似机构对该标准进行国际认证的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号