...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Quantum Chemistry >Comparison of Methods for Point-Charge Representation of Electrostatic Fields.
【24h】

Comparison of Methods for Point-Charge Representation of Electrostatic Fields.

机译:静电场点电荷表示方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The calculation of the electrostatic potential resultign form an infinite or extended array of charges in the interior of a region of interest is frequent task in computational chemistry.In case of a periodic potential this can,for example,be done by Ewald summation or by multipole methods.An important alternative are those methods where arrays of auxiliary point charges are optimized with respect to charge and/or position to reporduce the original electrostatic potential.In the literature differen tvariations are reported.we compare the performance of some of these with respect to their ability to reproduce the orginal potential and the computational effort required.Between(1)surface charges determined by the conductor-boundary condition,(2) optimized surface charges,and (3) surface charges floating on the surface we find that (2) offers good quality with small computational costs involved.
机译:在感兴趣的区域内部形成无限或扩展的电荷阵列来计算静电势是计算化学中的常见任务。在周期性势的情况下,这可以例如通过Ewald求和或多极来完成一种重要的替代方法是针对电荷和/或位置优化辅助点电荷阵列以抵消原始静电势的方法。文献中报道了不同的​​变化,我们比较了其中一些相对于在(1)由导体边界条件确定的表面电荷,(2)优化的表面电荷和(3)漂浮在表面上的表面电荷之间,我们发现(2)具有良好的质量,且计算成本较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号