...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of rehabilitation research: Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschungon >Improving balance in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.
【24h】

Improving balance in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.

机译:亚急性中风患者中平衡的改善:一项随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of balance training in a balance trainer, a newly developed mechanical device for training balance, with conventional balance training in subacute stroke patients. This was a randomized controlled study. Fifty participants met the inclusion criteria and 39 finished the study. The participants were randomly divided into control and balance trainer groups. The first had conventional balance training while the second trained balance in the balance trainer. All the participants trained balance 20 min per day, 5 days per week for 4 weeks and had additional 25 min of physiotherapy. Balance was assessed by the Berg Balance Scale, one-leg standing, Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test and 10 m walk. There was significant improvement in Berg Balance Scale (P<0.001), TUG (P<0.001) and 10 m walk (P=0.001) in both the groups, whereas no differences were found in any of these measures between the two groups either regarding overall average level or regarding average improvement. Both the groups improved significantly in standing on the healthy (P=0.001) as well as the impaired lower limb (P=0.005), whereby no significant differences were observed between the groups. Within both groups, significantly fewer subjects needed assistance of a physiotherapist for the 10 m walk and the TUG test at the end than at the beginning of the study (P=0.016). It can be concluded that both conventional balance training and training balance in the balance trainer equally improved balance in subacute stroke patients. The balance trainer cannot replace a physiotherapist but it is a safe and efficient supplementary method.
机译:该研究的目的是将平衡训练器(一种新开发的用于平衡训练的机械设备)与亚急性中风患者的传统平衡训练的功效进行比较。这是一项随机对照研究。 50名参与者符合纳入标准,39名参与者完成了研究。参与者被随机分为对照组和平衡教练组。前者进行了常规的平衡训练,而后者则在平衡训练器中进行了平衡训练。所有参与者每天训练20天,每周5天,持续4周,保持平衡,并进行25分钟的物理治疗。通过Berg平衡秤,单腿站立,定时起跑(TUG)测试和10 m步行来评估平衡。两组的平衡平衡量表(P <0.001),TUG(P <0.001)和10 m步行(P = 0.001)均有显着改善,而两组之间在这些指标上均未发现差异总体平均水平或关于平均改进。两组在站立时的健康状况(P = 0.001)和下肢受损(P = 0.005)均有显着改善,因此两组之间均未观察到显着差异。在两组中,与研究开始时相比,在开始时10m步行和TUG测试需要物理治疗师协助的受试者明显少得多(P = 0.016)。可以得出结论,传统的平衡训练和平衡训练器中的训练平衡都同样改善了亚急性中风患者的平衡。平衡训练器不能替代物理治疗师,但这是一种安全有效的补充方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号