...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication >Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication
【24h】

Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication

机译:使用社交媒体的社会科学学者为学术交流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate social science academics' use of social media for scholarly communication at Kuwait University. Design/methodology/approach - Phase One data were collected through web-based and paper responses to questionnaires. Faculty members, teachers and teaching assistants in the social science faculty were invited to participate. Forty-six of the 100 invited participants responded. Phase Two comprised interviews with 10 respondents. Findings - Social connection platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, received the highest mean score for use (M = 4.35), followed by mobile apps, such as WhatsApp (M = 4.24), and multimedia platforms such as Instagram and YouTube (M = 3.59). Moderate to low use was recorded for academic social media. ResearchGate recorded the highest use (M = 3.09), followed by academia.edu (M = 2.93). "Keeping in touch" was the most frequently reported activity (M = 4.04). Two-thirds of respondents used social media for informal scholarly communication with people they knew. "Lack of university encouragement" received the highest score (M = 3.54) as a factor inhibiting use and almost half the respondents (47.2 per cent) cited "lack of time" as a barrier. Practical implications - Improving academics' understanding of the uses of social media might increase their visibility and improve their research and other scholarly activities. Study findings support the development of relevant training programs that include a focus on integrating social media into research activities and the dissemination of research findings. Originality/value - This study contributes to the limited literature on this topic in Kuwait and the Arabian Gulf region.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是研究社会科学学者使用社会媒体为学术交流科威特大学。通过基于web的第一阶段的数据收集和纸回答问卷。成员,老师和助教社会科学教师应邀参与。参与者的反应。采访的受访者。连接平台,如Twitter和Facebook,获得最高的平均评分使用(M = 4.35),其次是移动应用,如WhatsApp (M = 4.24),和多媒体平台如Instagram和YouTube (M = 3.59)。中度至低为学术使用记录社交媒体。使用(M = 3.09),其次是academia.edu (M =2.93)。活动报道(M = 4.04)。受访者使用非正式的社交媒体学术交流与认识的人。“缺乏大学鼓励”了得分最高(M = 3.54)作为抑制因素使用,几乎一半的受访者(47.2分)援引“没有时间”的一个障碍。实际意义——提高学者的对社交媒体的使用可能的理解提高他们的可见性和改善他们的研究和其他学术活动。发现支持相关的发展培训项目,包括关注将社交媒体整合到研究活动和研究成果的传播。创意/值-这有助于学习关于这个主题的文献在科威特和有限阿拉伯海湾地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号