...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication >Acceptance and adoption of open access publishing by researchers in India
【24h】

Acceptance and adoption of open access publishing by researchers in India

机译:接受和采用开放获取出版研究人员在印度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to examine the level of open access (OA) adoption by researchers in Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), identify predictors of OA status (OA vs non-OA) and explore the availability of OA versions of the articles and venues used by the researches for hosting of their articles. Design/methodology/approach - Articles contributed by the researchers in IITs were searched using an advance search option in the Web of Science Core collection database. The search was restricted to journal articles published in English language in the year 2015. Of the 10,049 articles retrieved, 1,023 (10 per cent of the total) were chosen randomly. Articles selected after randomizations were exported to MS Excel for further analyses. Title of each article was searched in Google Scholar to assess its OA availability and venues used by the author for self-archiving. Details of ten articles could not be traced in Google Scholar, and they were excluded from the analysis. Based on the analysis of URLs, all OA articles were classified into three categories: gold OA, green OA and both gold and green OA. The OA articles available through green route were further classified into six categories based on the analysis of the websites and the self-archiving venues used by the authors: institutional repository, subject repository, researcher or scholar's website, organizational website, ResearchGate and other websites. Findings - Of 1,013 articles examined, OA versions were found for 68.70 per cent of articles. Of the total OA articles, 10.26 per cent articles were available through gold OA and 58.44 per cent were available through green OA, while remaining 6.21 per cent were available via both gold and green OA routes. Although researchers use different venues for self-archiving their articles, ResearchGate and institutional repositories are the most preferred choices by the researchers in IITs. Researchers in IITs are seemed to be unaware of the self-archiving policies of publishers, as more than 85 per cent self-archived articles were found as final PDF versions that are normally not allowed by the publishers. Research limitations/implications - This study is limited to IITs, but it offers theoretical implications for extending its scope to different subjects and institutes. The findings of the study may be useful for the publishers and institutions for formulating OA policies. The findings of the study might be used for raising awareness of OA among researchers and encouraging them to contribute their research outcome in OA outlets. Originality/value - This is the first study in India focusing on the availability of OA research.
机译:目的——本文的目的是检查的水平采用开放获取(OA)的研究人员印度理工学院(IITs),确定预测的办公自动化(OA vs non-OA)和地位探讨OA的版本的可用性文章和场馆使用的研究托管的文章。设计/方法/方法——文章贡献的理工学院的研究人员搜索使用一个搜索选项网络科学的核心数据库集合。搜索被限制为期刊文章2015年发表在英语语言。检索到的10049篇文章,1023 (10分总)中随机挑选的。随机化后选择出口女士Excel进行进一步的分析。在谷歌搜索学者来评估其办公作者使用的可用性和场所self-archiving。谷歌学者被追踪,排除在分析之外。url,所有办公用品分为三类:黄金OA,绿色办公和黄金和绿色办公。绿色路线进一步分为6个基于网站的分析范畴和使用的self-archiving场馆作者:机构库、主题库,研究人员或学者的网站,组织网站,ResearchGate网站和其他网站。OA版本的68.70%被发现文章。分是可以通过黄金OA和文章58.44%的人可以通过绿色办公,而剩下的6.21%则可以通过黄金和绿色OA路线。研究人员使用不同的场所self-archiving文章,ResearchGate网站机构知识库是最优先的理工学院的研究人员选择。在理工学院似乎没有意识到出版商self-archiving政策,更多比85%存档文章发现一般不作为最终的PDF版本所允许的出版商。限制/影响——这项研究是有限的理工学院,但它提供了理论意义扩展它的不同的对象和范围学院。有用的出版商和机构制定营运政策。研究OA的可用于提高意识对于研究者和鼓励他们他们的研究结果在OA门店作出贡献。创意/价值——这是第一个研究印度关注OA的可用性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号