...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >Systematic review of program evaluation in baccalaureate nursing programs
【24h】

Systematic review of program evaluation in baccalaureate nursing programs

机译:在学士学位护理计划中的计划评估系统评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Program evaluation is a common practice in nursing education programs; however, evidence indicates that many schools only focus on program evaluation around the scheduled accreditation period, thus reducing th(e) potential value of the evaluation. This systematic review explores the current program evaluation practices of prelicensure baccalaureate nursing programs. ERIC, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched to locate original research articles published in English. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria. The purposes of the evaluated studies varied from needing to meet external accountability requirements to proposing conceptual frameworks and evaluation tools. However, most studies focused on summative evaluation assessing program products and on providing evidence of program evaluation based on descriptive data. Notably, few studies employed a rigorous method to evaluate and interpret program evaluation findings. Most studies solicited information from multiple stakeholder groups, with students being the most represented. Despite the wide range of data collection tools used in the reviewed studies, reporting of validity and reliability was limited. Student grade point average, graduation rate, NCLEX passing rate, and satisfaction with the learning experience were the most common variables. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of current educational program evaluation practices in nursing education.
机译:项目评估是护理教育项目中的常见做法;然而,有证据表明,许多学校只关注计划认证期前后的项目评估,因此降低了评估的潜在价值。本课程对目前的护理预科课程进行了系统评估。ERIC、CINAHL和Scopus数据库被搜索,以查找以英文发表的原始研究文章。20篇文章符合入选标准。评估研究的目的各不相同,从需要满足外部问责要求到提出概念框架和评估工具。然而,大多数研究侧重于总结性评估评估项目产品,并基于描述性数据提供项目评估证据。值得注意的是,很少有研究采用严格的方法来评估和解释项目评估结果。大多数研究都从多个利益相关者群体中获取信息,其中学生代表最多。尽管在回顾性研究中使用了广泛的数据收集工具,但有效性和可靠性的报告有限。学生平均成绩、毕业率、NCLEX通过率和对学习体验的满意度是最常见的变量。需要进一步的研究来评估当前教育项目评估实践在护理教育中的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号