...
首页> 外文期刊>Angewandte Chemie >Electron-Transfer Transition States: Bound or Unbound—That is the Question!
【24h】

Electron-Transfer Transition States: Bound or Unbound—That is the Question!

机译:电子传输跃迁状态:束缚或未束缚—这就是问题!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The breathtaking advunees realized in the field of computational quantum chemistry within the past two decades have made it possible to reliably predict transition state structures for most reaction types in organic chemistry. The focus of controversyhas moved from the characterization of typical organic reaction mechanisms, such as pericyclic reactions, to more complex issues, such as reaction mechanisms in organometallic chemistry or the detailed desciiption of solvent effects. In light of this development it is quite surprising that little structural detail is available for the mos, elementary reaction step in chemistry, the exchange of electrons between two reaction partners. It was only recently realized that transition states for electron-transfer reactions might also have definitive structural requirements. Traditionally, electron-transfer (ET) reactions were qualitatively discussed in terms of outer-sphere and inner-sphere ET. These terms were originally coined for classifying ET reactionsbetween transition metal complexes, which either occur without breaking metal-ligand bonds (outer-sphere ET) or with concomitanl cleavage/formation of metal -ligand bonds (inner-sphere ET). Implicit in this categorization is the assumption that little interaction exists between the electron donor and acceptor in transition states of outer-sphere ET reactions, whereas the converse is true for inner-sphere ET reactions. Exactly this assumption was challenged by Eberson and Shaik through application of the valence-bond curve-crossing model (VBCM) to thermal ET reactions in open-shell systems. According to this qualitative model transition stales for dissociative electron transfer between radical unions and alkyl halides is stabilized by maximum overlap between the donor SOMO (singly occupied molecular orbital) and the alkyl halide LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital), whereas the most dominant interaction for the competing S_N2 transition stale is that between the donor pi HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and the alkyl halide LUMO. For the combination of ketyl radical anions and alkyl halides. the corresponding orbituls are shown in Scheme 1. The most important consequences of this are the following: a) Optimization of bimolecular orbital overlap is important for transition states of formal outer-sphere electron transfer. If not prohibited by steric effects, transition slates for electron transfer should be bound more strongly than either the rcactant or the product complexes, b) Different selection rules apply for transition states of electron transfer and nucleophilic substitution.
机译:在过去的二十年中,在计算量子化学领域实现的惊人发现使人们有可能可靠地预测有机化学中大多数反应类型的过渡态结构。争议的焦点已从典型的有机反应机理(例如周环反应)的表征转移到更复杂的问题,例如有机金属化学中的反应机理或对溶剂作用的详细描述。鉴于这种发展,令人惊讶的是,几乎没有结构细节可用于mos,化学中的基本反应步骤,两个反应伙伴之间的电子交换。直到最近才意识到,用于电子转移反应的过渡态也可能具有确定的结构要求。传统上,从外层和内层ET定性地​​讨论电子转移(ET)反应。这些术语最初是为对过渡金属络合物之间的ET反应进行分类而创造的,它们在不破坏金属-配体键的情况下发生(外层ET),或者在金属-配体键的concontantanl裂解/形成的情况下(内层ET)发生。这种分类的隐含假设是,在外球ET反应的过渡态中,电子供体与受体之间几乎没有相互作用,而内球ET反应则相反。正是通过将价键曲线交叉模型(VBCM)应用于开壳系统中的热ET反应,埃伯森和谢克对这一假设提出了挑战。根据该定性模型,供体SOMO(单分子轨道)和卤代烷LUMO(最低未占据分子轨道)之间的最大重叠使自由基缔合体与烷基卤化物之间的解离电子转移的过渡态得以稳定。竞争的S_N2过渡失效是在供体pi HOMO(最高占据分子轨道)和卤代烷LUMO之间。用于酮基阴离子和烷基卤的组合。方案1中显示了相应的轨道。最重要的结果如下:a)双分子轨道重叠的优化对于形式外层电子转移的过渡态很重要。如果不受空间效应的限制,则用于电子转移的过渡平板应比表面活性剂或产物配合物更牢固地结合。b)电子转移和亲核取代的过渡态适用不同的选择规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号