...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Potential impacts of water harvesting and ecological sanitation on crop yield, evaporation and river flow regimes in the Thukela River basin, South Africa
【24h】

Potential impacts of water harvesting and ecological sanitation on crop yield, evaporation and river flow regimes in the Thukela River basin, South Africa

机译:南非Thukela河流域的集水和生态卫生对作物产量,蒸发和河水流态的潜在影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study we explore the potential impacts of two strategies, namely in situ water harvesting (in situ WH) and fertilisation with stored human urine (Ecosan), to increase the water and nutrient availability in rain-fed smallholder agriculture in South Africa's Thukela River basin (29,000 km(2)). We use the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate potential impacts on smallholder maize yields, river flow regimes, plant transpiration, and soil and canopy evaporation during 1997-2006. Based on the results, the impacts on maize yields are likely to be small with in situ WH (median change: 0%) but significant with Ecosan (median increase: 30%). The primary causes for these effects are high nitrogen stress on crop growth, and low or untimed soil moisture enhancement with in situ WH. However, the impacts vary significantly in time and space, occasionally resulting in yield increases of up to 40% with in situ WH. Soil fertility improvements primarily increase yield magnitudes, whereas soil moisture enhancements reduce spatial yield variability. Ecosan significantly improves the productivity of the evaporative fluxes by increasing transpiration (median: 2.8%, 4.7 mm season(-1)) and reducing soil and canopy evaporation (median: -1.7%, -4.5 mm season(-1)). In situ WH does not generally affect the river flow regimes. Occasionally, significant regime changes occur due to enhanced lateral and shallow aquifer return flows. This leads to higher risks of flooding in some areas, but also to enhanced low flows, which help sustain aquatic ecosystems in the basin
机译:在这项研究中,我们探索了两种策略的潜在影响,即就地取水(就地WH)和利用人类尿液贮藏的肥料(Ecosan),以增加南非图克拉河雨养小农农业的水和养分利用率盆地(29,000 km(2))。我们使用土壤和水评估工具(SWAT)来模拟1997-2006年期间对小农玉米产量,河流流量,植物蒸腾作用以及土壤和冠层蒸发的潜在影响。根据结果​​,原位WH对玉米产量的影响可能很小(中位数变化:0%),而对生态卫生而言,影响很大(中位数增加:30%)。这些影响的主要原因是高氮胁迫对作物生长的影响,以及原位WH对土壤水分的低或不合时宜的提高。但是,影响在时间和空间上有很大差异,使用原位WH有时会导致产量增加多达40%。土壤肥力的改善首先增加了产量,而土壤水分的增加减少了空间产量的可变性。生态卫生通过增加蒸腾作用(中位数:2.8%,4.7毫米季节(-1))并减少土壤和冠层蒸发量(中位数:-1.7%,-4.5毫米季节(-1)),显着提高了蒸发通量的生产率。原位WH通常不会影响河流流量状况。有时,由于侧向和浅层含水层回流增加,发生了重大的政权变化。这导致某些地区发生洪灾的风险增加,但流量增加,从而有助于维持流域的水生生态系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号