...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Resource use efficiency and farm productivity gaps of smallholder dairy farming in North-west Michoacan, Mexico. (Special Issue: Designing sustainable agricultural production systems for a changing world: methods and applications.)
【24h】

Resource use efficiency and farm productivity gaps of smallholder dairy farming in North-west Michoacan, Mexico. (Special Issue: Designing sustainable agricultural production systems for a changing world: methods and applications.)

机译:墨西哥西北米却肯州小农户奶业的资源利用效率和农场生产力差距。 (特刊:为不断变化的世界设计可持续农业生产系统:方法和应用。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Smallholder dairy farms that intensify production risk resource degradation and increased dependence on external feeds and fertilizers due to lack of knowledge and appropriate technology, which undermines farm productivity and profitability. Here we analyze underlying causes at farm level of such process through an integrated analysis at the farm scale by assessing current resource use efficiency for grazing-based dairy farming systems representative of NW Michoacan, Mexico. Whole-farm yield gaps were quantified by comparing current farms to virtual reference farms that have the same farm surface area but improved farm management. Productivity of reference farms was calculated by assuming best crop production practices (as observed within the set of case study farms) and improved herd management. Three family-based (FB) and three semi-specialized (SS) dairy systems spanning three levels of intensification in terms of density of livestock units (LU): extensive (E, <0.8 LU ha-1), medium-intensive (M, between 0.8 and 1.2 LU ha-1), and intensive (I, >1.2 LU ha-1) were monitored during one year (rainy and dry seasons) to assess productivity and resource use efficiencies. Milk production was generally low and variable (2.2-4.3 Mg milk cow-1 lactation-1, and 0.6-5.8 Mg ha-1) due to high incidence of mastitis, a large fraction of non-productive animals in the herd and inefficient reproduction management. During the dry season, grazing areas provided insufficient metabolizable energy, and milk production was sustained through increased use of concentrates (from 310 g kg-1 DMI in rainy season to 454 g kg-1 DMI-1 in dry season of the herd) and conserved forage. All farms had positive nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium balances, averaging 75+or-16, 15+or-6, and 19+or-6 kg ha-1, respectively. Nutrients in animal excreta were mostly not recycled on the farms but lost to the environment, and nutrient surpluses increased with livestock density. The reference farms exhibited an attainable milk yield of 2.7 Mg ha-1 on the basis of full feed self-supply, and 4.2 Mg ha-1 when the crude protein limitation in the ration was lifted. Compared to the reference farm actual milk yields were on average 78.4% lower on FB farms and 57.9% lower on SS farms. The underlying causes of the farm yield gap differed between farms and were due to sub-optimal areas of forage maize, low forage and forage maize productivity and deficient herd management. We conclude that the farm yield gap analysis was effective in identifying the major shortcomings in management of the dairy farming systems and enabled formulation of change avenues for farm reconfiguration focusing on combined improvements in crop, feed and herd management and recycling of nutrients through manure management.
机译:由于缺乏知识和适当的技术,小农户的奶牛场加剧了生产风险,资源退化,对外部饲料和化肥的依赖增加,这损害了农场的生产力和盈利能力。在这里,我们通过对农场规模进行综合分析,通过评估代表墨西哥西北米却肯州的基于放牧的奶牛养殖系统的当前资源利用效率,来分析此类过程在农场一级的根本原因。通过将当前农场与具有相同农场表面积但改善了农场管理的虚拟参考农场进行比较,可以量化整个农场的产量差距。参考农场的生产率是通过假设最佳作物生产实践(在案例研究农场中观察到的)和改进的畜群管理来计算的。在牲畜单位密度(LU)方面,三个以家庭为基础的(FB)和三个半专业(SS)乳制品系统跨越了三个集约化程度:广泛(E,<0.8 LU ha -1 ),一年(一年)内监测中等强度(M,介于0.8至1.2 LU ha -1 )和强度(I,> 1.2 LU ha -1 )。雨季和旱季),以评估生产力和资源利用效率。牛奶产量普遍较低,且变化很大(泌乳期 -1 为2.2-4.3 Mg奶牛 -1 ,而ha -1 为0.6-5.8 Mg ha)由于乳腺炎的高发病率,畜群中大部分非生产性动物和低效的繁殖管理。在干旱季节,放牧区提供的代谢能不足,并且通过增加精矿的使用量(从雨季的310 g kg -1 DMI增加到454 g kg -1 < / sup> DMI -1 (牛群干旱季节)并保存草料。所有农场的氮,磷和钾平衡均处于正数,分别平均为75 + or-16、15 + or-6和19 + or-6 kg ha -1 。动物排泄物中的养分大部分不通过农场回收,而是流失到环境中,养分过剩随着牲畜密度的增加而增加。在完全饲料自给的基础上,参考农场的可达到的牛奶产量为2.7 Mg ha -1 ,而当粗蛋白限制时,其可达到4.2 Mg ha -1 。口粮取消了。与参考农场相比,FB农场的平均牛奶产量平均降低了78.4%,SS农场的平均牛奶产量降低了57.9%。农场之间的农场产量差距的根本原因有所不同,这是由于饲用玉米的面积不足,饲草和饲用玉米生产力低下以及牧群管理不足所致。我们得出的结论是,农场产量差距分析可以有效地发现奶牛养殖系统管理中的主要缺陷,并可以为农场改组制定变革途径,重点是改善作物,饲料和畜群管理以及通过粪便管理进行养分循环利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号