...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences >EMULATION VS. INDIGENIZATION IN THE RECEPTION OF WESTERN PSYCHOLOGY IN REPUBLICAN CHINA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENT OF CHINESE PSYCHOLOGY JOURNALS (1922-1937)
【24h】

EMULATION VS. INDIGENIZATION IN THE RECEPTION OF WESTERN PSYCHOLOGY IN REPUBLICAN CHINA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENT OF CHINESE PSYCHOLOGY JOURNALS (1922-1937)

机译:仿真与 共和党中西方心理学接受的蓄足性:中国心理学期刊含量分析(1922-1937)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study examines the practice of empirical psychology in China during the Republican period using a content analysis of its journals. By seeking answers to questions of what kinds of psychology from the West first attracted the Chinese; whether they found a way of developing a psychology more in tune to their own cultural assumptions of self-hood; and to what uses they felt the new discipline Could be put, it shows the extent to which its journal content adopted a Western or an indigenous orientation. It thus contributes to the recent debate about indigenization of psychology globally and situates the origins of these issues in China much earlier than has been envisaged by contemporary Chinese indigenous psychologists. Throughout this period, indigenous concerns informed the research agenda, the dominant practice being psychometrics. But because of a lack of social support, they remained largely confined to the pages of psychology journals.
机译:本研究探讨了中国期刊内容分析期间中国经验心理学的实践。 通过寻求答案,对西方的心理学的问题首次吸引了中国人; 他们是否找到了一种更加努力对自己的文化假设更加开发心理学的方式; 并且他们认为可以施用新纪律,它表明其期刊内容通过了西方或土着方向的程度。 因此,它有助于最近关于全球心理学的初步化的争论,并在中国的当代中国土着心理学家所设想的情况下,在中国的起源。 在此期间,土着担忧通知研究议程,主导实践是精神病学。 但由于缺乏社会支持,他们在很大程度上被限制在心理学期刊的页面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号