...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical systems >A Novel Smartphone Accelerometer Application for Low-Intensity Activity and Energy Expenditure Estimations in Overweight and Obese Adults
【24h】

A Novel Smartphone Accelerometer Application for Low-Intensity Activity and Energy Expenditure Estimations in Overweight and Obese Adults

机译:一种小说智能手机加速度计应用于超重和肥胖成年人的低强度活动和能源支出估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors are on the rise worldwide and contribute to the current overweight and obesity scourge. The loss of healthy life style benchmarks and the lack of the need to move make it necessary to provide feedback about physical and sedentary activities in order to promote active ways of life. The aim of this study was to develop a specific function adapted to overweight and obese people to identify four physical activity (PA) categories and to estimate the associated total energy expenditure (TEE). This function used accelerometry data collected from a smartphone to evaluate activity intensity and length, and TEE. The performance of the proposed function was estimated according to two references (Armband (R) and FitmatePro (R)) under controlled conditions (CC) for a 1.5-h scenario, and to the Armband (R) device in free-living conditions (FLC) over a 12-h monitoring period. The experiments were carried out with overweight and obese volunteers: 13 in CC and 27 in FLC. The evaluation differences in time spent in each category were lower than 7% in CC and 6% in FLC, in comparison to the Armband (R) and FitmatePro (R) references. The TEE mean gap in absolute value between the function and the two references was 9.3% and 11.5% in CC, and 8.5% according to Armband (R) in FLC.
机译:身体不活动和久坐行为在全球范围内崛起,并有助于目前的超重和肥胖祸害。丧失健康的生活方式基准和缺乏需要移动的必要性使得有必要提供有关身体和久坐活动的反馈,以促进积极的生活方式。本研究的目的是制定适应超重和肥胖人民的特定功能,以确定四个身体活动(PA)类别,并估计相关的总能源支出(TEE)。该功能使用从智能手机收集的加速度测量数据来评估活动强度和长度和TEE。根据的两个引用(armband(r)和fitMatepro(r))在受控条件(cc)下进行1.5-h场景,以及在自由生活条件下的臂带(r)设备( FLC)超过12小时的监测期。通过超重和肥胖志愿者进行实验:13 in CC和FLC中的27例。与ARMBAND(R)和FITMATEPRO(R)参考相比,每个类别中花费的评估差异低于CC和6%的5%。根据FLC中的ARMBAND(R),功能和两种参考之间的绝对值在功能和两种参考之间的绝对值为9.3%和11.5%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号