...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >What Do People Typically Do Between List Items? The Nature of Attention-Based Mnemonic Activities Depends on Task Context
【24h】

What Do People Typically Do Between List Items? The Nature of Attention-Based Mnemonic Activities Depends on Task Context

机译:人们通常在列表项目之间做什么? 关注的助记符的性质取决于任务背景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is commonly assumed that attention-demanding postencoding processes take place during the free time immediately following encoding of each memory item in a list. These processes are thought to prevent loss of information from working memory (WM). We tested whether interitem pauses during presentation of a list are used to focus attention (a) on the last-presented memory item or (b) on all items currently in WM. and (c) whether this changes over time. Here, we presented black probe letters between to-be-remembered red letters. Participants judged whether each probe letter corresponded to the last-presented memory item (last-item match group) or to any of the memory items presented up to that point in the list (any-item match group). To examine mnemonic processing as a function of time. the delay between the to-be-remembered letter and the following probe was manipulated in three experiments. When preprobe delays and interitem intervals were relatively short (Experiment 1), recall performance was observed to be better in the last-item match group and this did not change as a function of the duration of the delay before the probe. When preprobe delays and interitem intervals were longer however (Experiment 2), this disruptive effect of Any-item match instructions was no longer observed. This pattern was found again in Experiment 3 and suggests that the nature of the attention-demanding postencoding processes taking place in between memory items depends on task context in a systematic manner. The results are discussed in terms of previously proposed attention-demanding processes; specifically, consolidation and refreshing.
机译:通常假设在列表中的每个存储器项的编码后立即在空闲时间内进行注意力追加过程。这些过程被认为防止从工作存储器(WM)丢失信息。我们测试了在列表的演示期间interitem暂停是否用于在WM中当前的所有项目上对焦(a)对焦(a)。 (c)是否随着时间的推移变化。在这里,我们介绍了要记住的红色字母之间的黑色探针字母。参与者判断每个探测字母是否与上次呈现的内存项(最后一项匹配组)或任何内存项符合到列表中呈现的任何内存项(任何项匹配组)。作为时间的函数来检查助记处理。在三个实验中操纵待记住的信件和以下探针之间的延迟。当预填充延迟和Interitem间隔相对较短(实验1)时,观察到召回性能在最后一项匹配组中更好,并且这不会随着探测前延迟持续时间而改变。然而,当预填充延迟和相互关节间隔更长时(实验2),不再观察到任何项目匹配指令的这种破坏性效果。在实验3中再次发现该模式,并提出了在存储器项之间进行的注意力追踪过程的性质取决于以系统方式的任务环境。结果在先前提出的苛刻程序方面讨论了;具体而言,整合和刷新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号