...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral education >A Comparison of Simultaneous Prompting and Constant Time Delay Procedures in Teaching State Capitals
【24h】

A Comparison of Simultaneous Prompting and Constant Time Delay Procedures in Teaching State Capitals

机译:教学州首都同时提示和恒定时间延迟程序的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This investigation compared the effectiveness and efficiency of constant time delay (CTD) and simultaneous prompting (SP) procedures in teaching discrete social studies facts to 4 high school students with learning and behavior disorders using an adapted alternating treatments design nested within a multiple probe design. The results indicated that both procedures were effective, with the simultaneous prompting procedure being slightly more efficient in terms of errors during instructional and maintenance phases. In addition, when interviewed about their preferences, both the instructor and participants preferred the simultaneous prompting procedure. This investigation extends current research as there are small numbers of studies comparing SP to other response prompting strategies, and to date, SP and CTD have not been compared with high school students with high-incidence disabilities. Future research issues are discussed.
机译:该调查比较了恒定时间延迟(CTD)的有效性和效率,并同时提示(SP)程序教学,在三个高中学生教授4名高中生,使用适用的交替治疗设计在多种探针设计中嵌套。 结果表明,两种程序都有效,同时提示程序在教学和维护阶段的误差方面略微效率稍微效率。 此外,在采访他们的偏好时,教师和参与者都首选同时提示程序。 该调查扩展了当前研究,因为少量研究比较了SP到其他响应促使策略,迄今为止,尚未将SP和CTD与具有高发病率的高中生进行比较。 讨论了未来的研究问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号