...
首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Progress >Techno-Economic Evaluation of Producing Ethanol from Softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and Identification of Bottlenecks
【24h】

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Producing Ethanol from Softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and Identification of Bottlenecks

机译:从软木生产乙醇的技术经济评价:SSF和SHF的比较以及瓶颈的鉴定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to evaluate, from a technical and economic standpoint, the enzymatic processes involved in the production of fuel ethanol from softwood. Two base case configurations, one based on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and one based on separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), were evaluated and compared. The process conditions selected were based mainly on laboratory data, and the processes were simulated by use of Aspen plus. The capital costs were estimated using the Icarus Process Evalator. The ethanol produciton costs for the SSF and SHF base cases were 4.81 and 5.32 SEK/L or 0.57 and 0.63 USD/L (1 USD = 8.5SEK), respectively. The main reason for SSF being lower was that the capital cost was lower and the overall ethanol yield was higher. A major drawback of the SSF process is the problem with recirculation of yeast following the SSF step. Major economic improvements in both SSF and SHF could be achieved by increasing the income from the solid fuel coproduct. This is done by lowering the energy consumption in the process through running the enzymatic hydrolysis or the SSF step at a higher substrate concentration and by recycling the process streams. Running SSF withe use of 8% rather than 5% nonsoluble solid matreial would result in a 19% decrease in production cost. If after distillation 60% of the stillage stream was recycled back to the SSF step, the production cost would be reduced by 14%. The cumulative effect of these various improvements was found to result in a production cost of 3.58 SEK/L (0.42 USD/L) for the SSF process.
机译:该研究的目的是从技术和经济角度评估由软木生产燃料乙醇所涉及的酶促过程。评估并比较了两种基本情况,一种基于同时糖化和发酵(SSF),另一种基于单独的水解和发酵(SHF)。选择的工艺条件主要基于实验室数据,并且使用Aspen plus模拟工艺。使用伊卡洛斯过程评估器估算资本成本。 SSF和SHF基本案例的乙醇生产成本分别为4.81和5.32 SEK / L或0.57和0.63 USD / L(1 USD = 8.5SEK)。 SSF较低的主要原因是资本成本较低且乙醇总产率较高。 SSF方法的主要缺点是在SSF步骤之后酵母再循环的问题。通过增加固体燃料副产品的收入,可以实现SSF和SHF的重大经济改善。通过在较高的底物浓度下运行酶促水解或SSF步骤来降低工艺过程中的能耗,并通过循环工艺流来实现此目的。使用8%而不是5%的不溶性固体材料来运行SSF会导致生产成本降低19%。如果蒸馏后将60%的釜馏物流再循环回SSF步骤,生产成本将降低14%。发现这些改进的累积效应导致SSF工艺的生产成本为3.58 SEK / L(0.42 USD / L)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号