...
【24h】

Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy.

机译:3-T和1.5-T MRI在癫痫评估中的定性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: MRI at 3 T, which has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than 1.5-T MRI, is potentially more sensitive and specific at delineating epileptogenic lesions and may influence management of refractory epilepsy. The purposes of the current study were to compare image quality of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy and, in cases of focal epilepsy, to compare the two field strengths in terms of lesion detection and characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on 50 sets of MR images of 25 patients who underwent both 3-T and 1.5-T brain imaging with a dedicated epilepsy protocol, including fast spin-echo T2-weighted, coronal FLAIR, coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery, and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequences. Parameters assessed were distortion and artifact, lesion conspicuity, gray-white matter differentiation, and motion. Each pulse sequence was graded on a 4-point scale. Reviewers performed qualitative assessments of the site of abnormality and the most likely diagnosis. RESULTS: MRI at 3 T outperformed MRI at 1.5 T in all four parameters and was statistically superior (p < 0.05) to 1.5-T MRI in all categories except motion. On 3-T MRI, lesions were detected in 65 of 74 cases compared with 55 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0364), and lesions were accurately characterized in 63 of 74 cases compared with 51 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0194). The odds ratios showed identification of a focal epileptogenic lesion with 3-T MRI 2.57 times as likely as identification with 1.5-T MRI and accurate characterization of lesions 2.66 times as likely as characterization with 1.5-T MRI. CONCLUSION: In evaluation of epilepsy, MRI at 3 T performed better than 1.5-T MRI in image quality, detection of structural lesions, and characterization of lesions. High-field-strength imaging should be considered for patients with intractable epilepsy and normal or equivocal findings on 1.5-T MRI.
机译:目的:3 T MRI比1.5 T MRI具有更高的信噪比,在描绘癫痫病灶方面可能更加敏感和特异性,并可能影响难治性癫痫的治疗。本研究的目的是在癫痫评估中比较3-T MRI和1.5-T MRI的图像质量,在局灶性癫痫的情况下,比较两个区域在病变检测和表征方面的强度。材料与方法:回顾性分析了25例接受了专门针对癫痫方案的3-T和1.5-T脑成像的25例患者的MR图像,包括快速自旋回波T2加权冠状动脉FLAIR,冠状动脉快速多平面反演恢复和3D破坏的梯度称为回波脉冲序列。评估的参数包括变形和伪影,病变明显性,灰白色物质分化和运动。每个脉冲序列以4分制为等级。审稿人对异常部位和最可能的诊断进行了定性评估。结果:在所有四个参数下,3 T的MRI均优于1.5 T的MRI,在除运动之外的所有类别中,统计学上均优于1.5 T MRI(p <0.05)。在3-T MRI上,发现74例中的65例病变,而1.5 T时则发现74例中的55例(p = 0.0364),准确地表征74例中的63例,而在1.5 T时发现了74例中的51例( = 0.0194)。比值比显示,使用3-T MRI识别局灶性癫痫病变的可能性是1.5-T MRI识别的2.57倍,准确表征病变的可能性是1.5-T MRI表征的2.66倍。结论:在癫痫评估中,3 T MRI在图像质量,结构性病变的检测和病变特征方面的表现优于1.5 T MRI。对于顽固性癫痫且1.5-T MRI表现正常或模棱两可的患者,应考虑进行高场强成像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号