...
【24h】

Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography Image Quality With and Without Breast Shields.

机译:有无乳盾的冠脉CT血管造影图像质量比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of coronary CT angiography performed with and without breast shields.This study involved a retrospective cohort of 72 women with possible angina who underwent 64-MDCT retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography at a single academic tertiary medical center. Images of 36 women scanned while wearing bismuth-coated latex breast shields and 36 control subjects scanned without shields, matched by heart rate and body mass index, were graded on a standardized Likert scale for image quality, stenosis, and plaque by two independent board-certified readers blinded to breast shields.Seventy-two patients (mean [± SD] age, 53 ± 9 years) were included. The pre scan heart rate, body mass index, and Agatston score did not differ between groups. The median estimated radiation dose was 13.4 versus 16.1 mSv for those with and without breast shields (p = 0.003). For shielded versus unshielded scans, 86% versus 83% of coronary segments were rated excellent or above average (p = 0.4), median image quality was 2.0 for both groups, mean signal was 474 ± 75 and 452 ± 91 HU (p = 0.27), mean noise was 33.9 ± 8.5 and 29.8 ± 8.3 HU (p = 0.04), and median signal-to-noise ratio was 14.4 and 14.7 (p = 0.56), respectively.Breast shields for women undergoing coronary CT angiography slightly increased noise but did not negatively affect signal, signal-to-noise ratio, quality, or interpretability. Breast shield use warrants further study.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较使用和不使用乳盾进行的冠脉CT血管造影的图像质量。这项研究涉及72名患有心绞痛的女性的回顾性队列研究,这些女性在单项学术研究中接受了64-MDCT回顾性心电门控冠脉CT血管造影三级医疗中心。通过使用两个独立的板级图像,按照标准化的李克特量表对36名戴着铋涂层乳胶乳罩的女性进行扫描,并对36例不带乳罩的对照组进行扫描,并与心率和体重指数进行匹配,以评估图像质量,狭窄和斑块。获得认证的读者对乳盾不知情。包括72例患者(平均[±SD]年龄,53±9岁)。两组之间的预扫描心率,体重指数和Agatston评分无差异。中位估计辐射剂量为13.4 vs.16.1 mSv,带或不带乳盾的患者(p = 0.003)。对于屏蔽和非屏蔽扫描,冠状动脉节段的86%和83%被评为优秀或高于平均水平(p = 0.4),两组的中位图像质量均为2.0,平均信号分别为474±75和452±91 HU(p = 0.27) ),平均噪声分别为33.9±8.5和29.8±8.3 HU(p = 0.04),中值信噪比分别为14.4和14.7(p = 0.56)。但不会对信号,信噪比,质量或可解释性产生负面影响。乳房防护罩的使用值得进一步研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号