...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Comparison of four prediction models to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures according to MRI feature analysis.
【24h】

Comparison of four prediction models to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures according to MRI feature analysis.

机译:根据MRI特征分析比较四种区分恶性椎体压缩性骨折良性的预测模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to identify a set of significant predictors, predominantly based on MRI features and limited demographic data, for differentiating benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) and to compare the diagnostic value of four different types of prediction models.The cohort included 101 subjects (mean age, 64 years; range, 22-89 years; 39.6% were men) with 128 VCFs, 84 (65.6%) of which were proven to be malignant by biopsy or follow-up imaging. A set of 36 predictors (34 MRI features, age, and sex) was acquired for each VCF retrospectively.Univariate analysis and initial variable screening selected 14 moderately significant predictors. All four model types performed similarly in overall discrimination power. The median area under the curve for each model type was 0.872 for logistic regression, 0.781 for classification tree, 0.760 for support vector machine, and 0.730 for neural network, but no significant difference was found between any two model types by Student t test. Five predictors for the logistic regression model were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Focal paraspinal mass and depositlike appearance of pedicle involvement were positively correlated with VCF malignancy. Age, other compression deformities without bone marrow edema, and intravertebral fluid collection or fluid signal were negatively correlated with VCF malignancy.It is possible to estimate the malignancy risk of VCF by using a small number of MRI features and patient age. The diagnostic performance of models selected by logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, and classification tree was similar.
机译:这项研究的目的是主要根据MRI特征和有限的人口统计数据确定一组重要的预测指标,以区分良性与椎骨压缩性骨折(VCF)的良性,并比较四种不同类型的预测模型的诊断价值。该队列包括101名受试者(平均年龄64岁;范围22-89岁;男性占39.6%),有128个VCF,其中84例(65.6%)经活检或随访影像学证实为恶性。回顾性地为每个VCF采集了36个预测因子(34个MRI特征,年龄和性别)。单因素分析和初始变量筛选选择了14个中等显着预测因子。所有四种模型类型在总体判别力上的表现均相似。逻辑回归的每种模型类型的曲线下中值面积分别为0.872,分类树为0.781,支持向量机为0.760,神经网络为0.730,但是通过Student t检验,发现这两种模型类型之间均无显着差异。 Logistic回归模型的五个预测因素具有统计学意义(p <0.01)。椎管旁的局灶性肿块和蒂的沉积样外观与VCF恶性程度呈正相关。年龄,其他无骨髓水肿的压迫畸形,椎管内积液或体液信号与VCF恶性呈负相关。可以通过使用少量MRI表现和患者年龄来估算VCF的恶性风险。通过逻辑回归,支持向量机,神经网络和分类树选择的模型的诊断性能相似。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号