...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Screening CT colonography: Multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence
【24h】

Screening CT colonography: Multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence

机译:筛查CT结肠造影:对患者经验,喜好以及对依从性的潜在影响进行多中心调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Prior research indicates CT colonography (CTC) would be a cost-effective colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test if widespread availability were to increase overall CRC screening adherence rates. The primary aims of this multicenter study were to evaluate patient experience and satisfaction with CTC screening and compare preference against screening colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 12-question survey instrument measuring pretest choice, experience, and satisfaction was given to a consecutive cohort of adults undergoing CTC screening in three disparate screening settings: university academic center, military medical center, and community practice. The study cohort was composed of individuals voluntarily participating in clinical CTC screening programs. RESULTS. A total of 1417 patients responded to the survey. The top reasons for choosing CTC for screening included " noninvasiveness" (68.0%), "avoidance of sedation/anesthesia"(63. 1%), "ability to drive after the test" (49.2%), "avoidance of optical colonoscopy risks"(46.9%), and "identifying abnormalities outside the colon" (43.3%). Only 7.2% of patients reported pain during the CTC examination and only 2.5% reported greater than moderate discomfort. Of 441 patients who had experienced both CTC and optical colonoscopy, 77.1% preferred CTC and 13.8% preferred optical colonoscopy. Of all patients, 29.6% indicated that they may not have undergone optical colonoscopy screening if CTC were not available. Of all patients, 92.9% labeled their overall experience with CTC as "excellent" or "good," and 93.0% indicated they would choose CTC for their next screening. CONCLUSION. Respondents reported a very high satisfaction level with CTC, and those who had experienced both modalities indicated a preference for CTC over optical colonoscopy. These results suggest that CTC has the potential to increase adherence to CRC screening guidelines if widely available.
机译:目的。先前的研究表明,如果广泛使用可提高总体CRC筛查依从率,则CT结肠造影(CTC)将是一种具有成本效益的大肠癌(CRC)筛查试验。这项多中心研究的主要目的是评估患者对CTC筛查的经验和满意度,并比较对结肠镜检查的偏好。材料和方法。在连续三个队列中,在大学学术中心,军事医学中心和社区实践三个不同的筛查环境中,对连续接受CTC筛查的成年人群,提供了一个12个问题的调查工具,用于测量其测试前的选择,经验和满意度。该研究队列由自愿参加临床CTC筛查计划的人员组成。结果。共有1417例患者对此调查作出了回应。选择CTC进行筛查的主要原因包括“无创性”(68.0%),“避免镇静/麻醉”(63. 1%),“测试后驾驶能力”(49.2%),“避免光学结肠镜检查的风险” “(46.9%)”和“识别结肠外异常”(43.3%)。仅7.2%的患者在CTC检查期间报告疼痛,只有2.5%的患者报告中度不适。在经历过CTC和光学结肠镜检查的441例患者中,77.1%的患者首选CTC,13.8%的患者首选光学结肠镜。在所有患者中,有29.6%的患者表示如果没有CTC,他们可能没有接受光学结肠镜检查。在所有患者中,有92.9%的患者将他们在CTC方面的总体经历标记为“优秀”或“良好”,而93.0%的患者表示他们会选择CTC进行下次筛查。结论。受访者表示对CTC的满意度很高,而经历过这两种方式的受访者表示,对CTC的偏好高于光学结肠镜检查。这些结果表明,如果可以广泛使用,CTC有可能增加对CRC筛查指南的依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号