...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study.
【24h】

Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study.

机译:使用冠脉CT血管造影术中的自适应统计迭代重建估算的辐射剂量减少:ERASIR研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and study quality for coronary CT angiography (CTA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 574 consecutive patients undergoing coronary CTA at three centers. Comparisons were performed between consecutive groups initially using filtered back projection (FBP) (n = 331) and subsequently ASIR (n = 243) with regard to patient and scan characteristics, radiation dose, and diagnostic study quality. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in the use of prospective gating, tube voltage, or scan length. The examinations performed using ASIR had a lower median tube current than those obtained using FBP (median [interquartile range], 450 mA [350-600] vs 650 mA [531-750], respectively; p < 0.001). There was a 44% reduction in the median radiation dose between the FBP and ASIR cohorts (4.1 mSv [2.3-5.2] vs 2.3 mSv [1.9-3.5]; p < 0.001). After adjustment for scan settings, ASIR was associated with a 27% reduction in radiation dose compared with FBP (95% CI, 21-32%; p < 0.001). Despite the reduced current, ASIR was not associated with a difference in adjusted signal, noise, or signal-to-noise ratio (p = not significant). No differences existed between FBP and ASIR for interpretability per coronary artery (98.5% vs 99.3%, respectively; p = 0.12) or per patient (96.1% vs 97.1%, p = 0.65). CONCLUSION. ASIR enabled reduced tube current and lower radiation dose in comparison with FBP, with preserved signal, noise, and study interpretability, in a large multicenter cohort. ASIR represents a new technique to reduce radiation dose in coronary CTA studies.
机译:目的:我们的研究目的是评估自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)对冠状CT血管造影(CTA)的辐射剂量和研究质量的影响。研究对象和方法:我们在三个中心前瞻性地评估了574例连续接受冠状动脉CTA的患者。在连续组之间进行比较,首先在患者和扫描特征,放射剂量和诊断研究质量方面使用滤波反投影(FBP)(n = 331),然后使用ASIR(n = 243)。结果:两组在使用预期门控,管电压或扫描长度方面无差异。使用ASIR进行的检查比使用FBP进行的检查具有更低的中位管电流(中位[四分位数间距],分别为450 mA [350-600]和650 mA [531-750]; p <0.001)。 FBP和ASIR队列之间的中位辐射剂量减少了44%(4.1 mSv [2.3-5.2]对2.3 mSv [1.9-3.5]; p <0.001)。调整扫描设置后,与FBP相比,ASIR可使放射剂量减少27%(95%CI,21-32%; p <0.001)。尽管电流减小,但ASIR与调整后的信号,噪声或信噪比的差异无关(p =不显着)。 FBP和ASIR在每个冠状动脉(分别为98.5%对99.3%; p = 0.12)或每个患者(96.1%对97.1%,p = 0.65)的可解释性上没有差异。结论。在大型多中心队列研究中,与FBP相比,ASIR能够降低电子管电流并降低辐射剂量,并保持信号,噪声和研究的可解释性。 ASIR是减少冠状动脉CTA研究中辐射剂量的一种新技术。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号