...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography.
【24h】

Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography.

机译:胆管癌的术前评估:MRI结合MR胰胆管造影与MDCT结合直接胆管造影。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with that of MDCT combined with direct cholangiography in the evaluation of the tumor extent and resectability of bile duct cancer with surgical and pathologic findings as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2003 to March 2006, 27 patients (18 men, nine women; mean age, 60.8 years; range, 43-80 years) with surgically proven hilar cholangiocarcinoma or common bile duct (CBD) cancer who had undergone preoperative 2D and 3D MRCP with gadolinium-enhanced MRI and triple-phase MDCT with direct cholangiography (ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography) were included in this retrospective study. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed the two image sets. These readers evaluated the longitudinal extent of the tumor for involvement of the secondary confluence of both intrahepatic ducts and the intrapancreatic CBD, vascular involvement of the tumor, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability. The radiologists' performance was evaluated by calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Correlation was made with the resected specimens or findings at surgical exploration. RESULTS: For each reviewer, the overall accuracy rates for predicting involvement of the bilateral secondary biliary confluences and the intrapancreatic CBD were 90.7% and 87.0% for MRI with MRCP and 85.1% and 87.0% for MDCT with direct cholangiography. The differences were not statistically significant for either image set for either reviewer (p > 0.05). In the assessment of vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability, the readers' diagnostic performance using MRI with MRCP was similar to that with MDCT with direct cholangiography (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of bile duct cancer with a noninvasive procedure, the information regarding tumor extent and resectability obtained with contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MRCP is comparable with that obtained with MDCT with direct cholangiography.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较MRI结合MR胰胆管造影(MRCP)与MDCT结合直接胆管造影的表现,以评估胆管癌的肿瘤范围和可切除性,并以手术和病理学检查为参考标准。材料与方法:从2003年1月至2006年3月,有27例经手术证实的肝门胆管癌或胆总管癌的患者(男18例,女9例;平均年龄60.8岁;范围43-80岁)。这项回顾性研究包括采用g增强MRI的2D和3D MRCP以及直接胆管造影(ERCP或经皮肝穿刺胆管造影)的三相MDCT。两名经验丰富的放射科医生独立审查了这两个图像集。这些读者评估了肿瘤的纵向范围,涉及肝内导管和胰内CBD的继发性融合,肿瘤的血管累及,淋巴结转移和肿瘤可切除性。通过计算敏感性,特异性和整体准确性来评估放射科医生的表现。与切除的标本或手术探查结果相关。结果:对于每位评价者而言,MRCP MRI预测双侧继发性胆道融合和胰内CBD的总准确率分别为90.7%和87.0%,而直接胆管造影的MDCT预测为85.1%和87.0%。对于任何一个审阅者,这两个图像集的差异均无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。在评估血管受累,淋巴结转移和肿瘤可切除性时,使用MRCP进行MRI的读者的诊断表现与使用直接胆管造影的MDCT的读者的诊断表现相似(p> 0.05)。结论:在以非侵入性方法诊断胆管癌中,对比增强MRI结合MRCP获得的有关肿瘤范围和可切除性的信息可与直接胆管造影的MDCT获得的信息相媲美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号