...
【24h】

Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades?

机译:诊断程序的准确性:在过去的五十年中,它是否有所改善?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

So wrote L. Henry Garland in his classic pioneering article on diagnostic errors published in the American Journal of Roentgenology. Garland went on to relate that when one of his friends, a well-known professor of radiology, learned that Garland's research disclosed that radiologists missed about one third of roentgenologically positive findings, the friend expressed the hope that Garland would discontinue his "investigations in this field because they were so morale-disturbing. When other radiologists were confronted with this data, continued Garland, their usual reaction was "Well, in my everyday work this does not apply; I would do better than those busy investigators" .
机译:L.亨利·加兰(L. Henry Garland)在《美国放射学杂志》上发表的有关诊断错误的经典开篇文章中写道。 Garland继续说,当他的一位朋友(一位著名的放射学教授)得知Garland的研究显示放射学家错过了X射线学检查阳性结果的三分之一时,这位朋友表示希望Garland停止他的“研究”。加兰德继续说,当其他放射线医生面对这些数据时,他们通常的反应是:“嗯,在我的日常工作中,这并不适用;我会比那些忙碌的调查员做得更好。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号