...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Overall survival after transarterial lipiodol infusion chemotherapy with or without embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score analysis.
【24h】

Overall survival after transarterial lipiodol infusion chemotherapy with or without embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score analysis.

机译:难治性肝细胞癌经或不经栓塞的经动脉脂质体碘油灌注化疗后的总生存期:倾向评分分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Although iodized oil transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been found to have survival benefit in the care of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, iodized oil infusion chemotherapy without embolization has not been clearly found inferior to or equal to TACE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether one of these therapies is superior to the other or the two are equal in survival benefit and whether embolization with gelatin sponge particles is indispensable to prolonging survival. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective nonrandomized observational cohort study was conducted over 8 years. Among 11,030 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, 8,507 underwent TACE, and 2,523 underwent transarterial infusion therapy with an emulsion of iodized oil and an anticancer agent as initial treatment. Patients with extrahepatic metastasis or any previous treatment were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. To minimize selection bias, propensity score analysis was used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 5,044 patients (46%) died. In the analysis of all patients, TACE was associated with a significantly higher survival rate than infusion therapy without embolization (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.56-0.64; p = 0.0001). The propensity score analysis showed that the hazard ratio for death in the TACE group (n = 1,699 patients) compared with the group who underwent infusion therapy without embolization (n = 1,699) was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76; p = 0.0001). The median survival time of the TACE group was 2.74 years, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 81%, 46%, and 25%. The corresponding values for the group who underwent transarterial infusion therapy without embolization were 1.98 years and 71%, 33%, and 16%. CONCLUSION: Propensity score analysis showed that in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE was associated with significantly better overall survival rates than was transarterial infusion therapy without embolization. TACE can be recommended as initial treatment of these patients.
机译:目的:尽管发现碘油经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)在不能切除的肝细胞癌患者的治疗中具有生存优势,但尚未明确发现未栓塞的碘油输注化疗不及TACE或等于TACE。这项研究的目的是确定这些疗法中的一种是否优于另一种,或者两者在生存获益方面是否相等,以及明胶海绵颗粒栓塞对于延长生存期是否必不可少。研究对象和方法:一项为期8年的前瞻性非随机观察队列研究。在11030例无法切除的肝细胞癌患者中,有8507例接受了TACE,2523例接受了经动脉输注的治疗,其中加有碘油和抗癌剂的乳剂作为初始治疗。排除肝外转移或任何先前治疗的患者。主要终点是全因死亡率。为了使选择偏差最小化,倾向得分分析用于比较两组。结果:在随访期间,有5,044名患者(46%)死亡。在所有患者的分析中,与无栓塞的输注治疗相比,TACE的存活率显着更高(危险比,0.60; 95%CI,0.56-0.64; p = 0.0001)。倾向评分分析显示,与接受无栓塞输注治疗的患者(n = 1699)相比,TACE组(n = 1699患者)的死亡危险比为0.70(95%CI,0.63-0.76; p = 0.0001) )。 TACE组的中位生存时间为2.74年,而1年,3年和5年生存率分别为81%,46%和25%。接受无栓塞的经动脉输注治疗的组的相应值为1.98岁,分别为71%,33%和16%。结论倾向评分分析显示,在无法切除的肝细胞癌患者中,与未栓塞的经动脉输注治疗相比,TACE的总生存率显着提高。 TACE可以推荐作为这些患者的初始治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号