...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Perceptibility and quantification of in-stent stenosis with six peripheral arterial stent types in vitro: comparison of 16-MDCT angiography, 64-MDCT angiography, and MR angiography.
【24h】

Perceptibility and quantification of in-stent stenosis with six peripheral arterial stent types in vitro: comparison of 16-MDCT angiography, 64-MDCT angiography, and MR angiography.

机译:六种外周动脉支架类型的支架内狭窄的可感知性和定量:16-MDCT血管造影,64-MDCT血管造影和MR血管造影的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the perceptibility of 75% and 95% in-stent stenoses with CT angiography and MR angiography using six stent types in a phantom model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six different stent types were placed into tubes filled with contrast agent (ioversol or gadoteric acid), and nylon cylinders (8 mm diameter) bored in the central axis (2 and 4 mm) to mimic 75% and 95% stenoses were inserted into the stents inside the tubes. CT angiography (16- and 64-MDCT scanners using three different kernels at 120 and 140 kV) and MR angiography (1.5 T) were performed. On 2-mm coronal sections, signal intensities in the stenosed stents were compared with unstenosed segments. In addition, perceptibility of the residual lumen was assessed using a subjective score. Image analysis was performed by two experienced and blinded radiologists. RESULTS: Sixteen-slice CT angiography showed relative in-stent signal intensities of 72-87%, whereas 64-MDCT angiography showed relative in-stent signal intensities of 63-99%. Sixty-four-slice CT angiography showed nearly no difference between 75% and 95% stenoses in the subjective scores. The high-contrast kernel was superior to intermediate- and low-contrast kernels. MR angiography showed relative in-stent signal intensities of 57-98%. The presence of localized artifacts and resulting inhomogeneous luminal signal caused lower subjective perceptibility ratings than the objective score would suggest. CONCLUSION: CT angiography was superior in the differentiation between 95% stenoses and occlusions. 64-MDCT angiography was superior to 16-MDCT (mean +/- SD, 83.0 +/- 2.9 vs 78.3 +/- 3.3; p = 0.006), especially with high-contrast kernels (89.7 +/- 2.1 vs 78.3 +/- 3.3; p = 0.001). For detection of 75% stenoses, MR angiography seems to be suitable subjectively, even though no statistical significance was found.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较使用幻影模型中的六种支架类型的CT血管造影和MR血管造影对75%和95%支架内狭窄的可感知性。材料和方法:将六种不同类型的支架放入装有造影剂(碘夫醇或g酸)的试管中,并在中心轴(2和4 mm)上钻尼龙管(直径8 mm)以模拟75%和95%的狭窄被插入到管内的支架中。进行了CT血管造影(使用120和140 kV的三个不同核的16和64-MDCT扫描仪)和MR血管造影(1.5 T)。在2毫米冠状切片上,将狭窄支架中的信号强度与未狭窄部分进行了比较。另外,使用主观评分评估残余管腔的可感知性。图像分析是由两名经验丰富的双盲放射科医生进行的。结果:16层CT血管造影显示支架内相对信号强度为72-87%,而64-MDCT血管造影显示支架内相对信号强度为63-99%。 64层CT血管造影显示主观评分在75%和95%狭窄之间几乎没有差异。高对比度内核优于中对比度和低对比度内核。 MR血管造影显示支架内相对信号强度为57-98%。局部伪像的存在和所导致的不均匀的管腔信号导致的主观可感知性等级低于客观评分所暗示的。结论:CT血管造影在95%狭窄和闭塞之间的区分上具有优势。 64-MDCT血管造影优于16-MDCT(平均+/- SD,83.0 +/- 2.9与78.3 +/- 3.3,p = 0.006),尤其是对于高对比度内核(89.7 +/- 2.1与78.3 + / -3.3; p = 0.001)。对于75%的狭窄,即使没有发现统计学意义,MR血管造影似乎主观上也很合适。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号